In Part I of this two-part series published on May 12, we described China’s new Charity Law and its implications for charitable organizations operating in the country, both domestic and foreign. On April 28, the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress enacted another new law, this one governing foreign non-governmental organizations (“NGOs”) operating in China. This new Law on the Management of the Activities of Foreign Non-Governmental Organizations Within China (“Foreign NGO Law”) will go into effect on January 1, 2017 (Chinese text with unofficial English translation available here).

The Foreign NGO Law contains some specific requirements, but like many other high-level Chinese laws, it is relatively general in many respects (for example, with respect to what kinds of activities a representative office of a foreign NGO may conduct). We may get further texture in the coming months as the government is expected to release, first, a list of Frequently Asked Questions with accompanying answers, and then, later, implementing regulations or other forms of guidance. However, it is possible that some aspects will remain unclear, giving regulatory authorities greater discretion in the interpretation and application of the law’s provisions.

The Foreign NGO Law has generated significant criticism in the international community as critics argue that it could have a chilling effect on organizations engaging in or supporting social organizations in China. Chinese authorities, on the other hand, argue that the law lends clarity to a previously ambiguous operating environment for foreign NGOs and serves the government’s need to ensure national security and social stability. We examine some of the key features of the new law here:

  • Definition of “Foreign NGO.” The Foreign NGO Law defines “foreign NGOs” as “not-for-profit, non-governmental social organizations lawfully established outside of China, such as foundations, social groups, and think tanks.” Note that trade associations would likely fall within the jurisdiction of the law.
  • Unclear Treatment of Foreign Schools, Research/Academic Organizations, and Hospitals. In what appears to be a concession to organizations, such as foreign universities, that felt that the definition provided in a draft version of the law circulated last year was overbroad, Article 53 states that “exchanges or cooperation” with corresponding Chinese counterparts conducted by “foreign schools, hospitals, and natural sciences and engineering technology research institutions [and] academic organizations” are to be handled by laws and regulations specifically governing those activities (and presumably, subject to further clarification, do not require the registrations/filings contemplated under this new law). How broadly “exchanges or cooperation” is defined, and how activities outside the scope of “exchanges or cooperation” are to be treated, remains unclear. For example, in the case of universities, it is unclear how the authorities will view student recruiting, alumni engagement, executive education programs, and wholly foreign-owned enterprises (WFOEs) they may have established.
  • Leading Role of Ministry of Public Security. The government’s security concerns are clearly central to the new law, which places the lead responsibility for the registration and supervision of foreign NGOs with the Ministry of Public Security (“MPS”; note that references in this article to the Ministry of Public Security include its local counterparts), which manages the country’s police apparatus. Foreign NGOs have long had an uneasy relationship with the Ministry of Public Security, and are concerned that the new law provides a legal basis for Chinese security authorities to more actively intervene in their activities. The Chinese government acknowledges its security concerns with respect to foreign NGOs, but also claims that the choice of MPS was driven by a determination that it is the agency most competent in addressing issues related to foreigners in China.
  • Representative Offices. Foreign NGOs “that, outside of China, have existed for at least two years and have carried out substantial activities” may now register with MPS in order to set up representative offices in China (they may open multiple representative offices in different parts of the country). Representative offices do not have independent legal person status, meaning that legal responsibility is borne by the foreign NGO. Previously, there was no path for foreign NGOs (except foundations) to set up non-profit entities or offices in China. The only exception was in Yunnan Province.Foreign NGOs may not set up branches (or subsidiaries) in China, and they may not develop a membership consisting of Chinese citizens, unless otherwise prescribed by the State Council.
  • The new law does not explain what activities representative offices of foreign NGOs in China may carry out. For reference, regulations only permit the representative offices of foreign enterprises to engage in (i) market survey, exhibition, and publicity activities related to their products and services, and (ii) liaison activities.
  • Temporary Activities. The new law simplifies the process for foreign NGOs that seek to engage in activities in China without an established representative office. Foreign NGOs may engage in “temporary activities” by partnering with local entities, but such activities may not last for more than one year (unless a refiling is done). Foreign NGOs and partnering Chinese entities are required to file with the relevant public security authorities in advance, and they must report on the activities conducted and the use of funds within 30 days after the conclusion of the temporary activities.
  • Professional Supervisory Units. Before they can register for a representative office with the Ministry of Public Security, foreign NGOs must obtain the approval of the appropriate “professional supervisory unit.” Professional supervisory units are likely to be government agencies responsible for regulating various fields. For instance, an education-related organization would be supervised by the Ministry of Education or its local counterparts. MPS is to issue a catalog of designated professional supervisory units.
  • Professional supervisory units are responsible for reviewing the annual plans and reports (including financial reports audited by Chinese accounting firms) of representative offices under their scope of authority.
  • Broad MPS Enforcement Powers. While MPS previously wielded considerable powers, the new law provides a legal basis for the security authorities to exercise significant powers to discipline foreign NGOs engaging in activities that they (in their broad discretion) suspect or deem to be in violation of the Foreign NGO Law and other laws and regulations. When MPS suspects that a violation may have occurred, security authorities may compel the chief representative and other responsible individuals associated with a foreign NGO to be interviewed; collect any documents and materials related to the potentially infringing activities; freeze bank accounts; and/or seize facilities and other assets. When MPS deems that a violation has, in fact, occurred, the security authorities may issue a warning; deport non-citizens; and revoke the registration of a representative office or terminate temporary activities, and prohibit re-registration or further temporary activities in China for a period of five years. MPS may even add a foreign NGO to a black list, permanently prohibiting the NGO from re-registering or engaging in temporary activities in China. In addition to foreign NGOs deemed to be in violation of the Foreign NGO Law, culpable Chinese collaborators and beneficiaries may also be subject to sanctions under the law.
  • Permitted and Prohibited Activities. The new law provides that MPS will publish catalogues listing fields and types of projects in which foreign NGOs are welcome to engage. Foreign NGOs may carry out activities using their registered name and within their registered operational scope and geographic region.

However, foreign NGOs are prohibited from conducting activities that are for-profit, political, or religious in nature. They are also prohibited from engaging in activities that “endanger China’s national unity, security, or ethnic unity; or harm China’s national interests, the public interest, or the lawful rights and interests of citizens, legal persons, or other organizations.” Combined with the broad conception of “national security” in the new National Security Law passed last July, regulating authorities will likely wield (or continue to wield, but now with greater legal basis) significant discretion in determining which activities they find unacceptable.

  • Fundraising Restrictions. Foreign NGOs may not fundraise in China and may only operate bank accounts in the country that are filed with and can be supervised by MPS. Further, they must publicly disclose their audited financial accounting reports. Despite such restrictions, it appears that foreign NGOs may still partner with Chinese charity organizations whereby a Chinese organization may receive funds and assets raised through a foreign NGO’s efforts and then donate them to activities sponsored or led by the foreign NGO.
  • Limitations on Use of Bank Accounts. Foreign NGOs’ representative offices may only use bank accounts recorded with MPS for activities in China. Unregistered foreign NGOs engaging in temporary activities must use their Chinese partner entities’ bank accounts.
  • Extensive Reporting Requirements. Representative offices of foreign NGOs must submit an annual activity plan to their professional supervisory units for the following year by December 31 of each year (starting in 2017), and then subsequently file with MPS. Any adjustments to the plan require filing as well, and deviations from the plan can have serious consequences.Foreign NGOs’ representative offices must also “report information on employed personnel to the professional supervisory units and [public security authorities].”
  • Representative offices of Foreign NGOs must also submit annual work reports to their professional supervisory units by January 31 of each year, and then to MPS by March 31. These annual work reports must include financial accounting reports audited by Chinese accounting firms together with information on activities, personnel, and organizational changes. Annual work reports are to be published online on a unified MPS website.
  • Employment Procedures. The law states that the chief representative and other foreign representatives who are employees of foreign NGO representative offices are eligible for employment and other work formalities (e.g., work permits).
  • Rumors and Harmful Information. Among other violations of the Foreign NGO Law and other laws and regulations, the law states that foreign NGOs may have their registration or temporary activities canceled, and even responsible personnel detained, for, among other things, “creating rumors, engaging in defamation, or publishing or disseminating other harmful information that endangers state security or damages the national interest.”

While the law may indeed bring greater clarity to the legal and regulatory environment for foreign NGO activities in China, the contours of that environment may be less friendly to foreign NGOs than many in the international community had hoped. As with the Charity Law, much will depend on how the government implements the provisions of this law through implementing regulations, guidance, and practice.

Shirleen Hong, Ning Lu, and Eric Carlson of Covington & Burling LLP assisted with the research and preparation of this article. The unofficial English translation of the law used here is based on that provided by here.

Photo of Ashwin Kaja Ashwin Kaja

With over a decade of experience in China, Ashwin Kaja helps multinational companies, governments, and other clients understand and navigate the complex legal and policy landscape in the country. He plays a leading role in Covington’s China international trade and public policy practices…

With over a decade of experience in China, Ashwin Kaja helps multinational companies, governments, and other clients understand and navigate the complex legal and policy landscape in the country. He plays a leading role in Covington’s China international trade and public policy practices and, outside of Covington, serves as the General Counsel of the American Chamber of Commerce in China.

Ashwin helps clients solve acute problems that arise in the course of doing business in China and position themselves for longer-term success in the country’s rapidly evolving legal and policy environment. He is an expert on Chinese industrial policy and has worked on matters related to a wide range of sectors including technology, financial services, life sciences, and the social sector. Ashwin has also counseled a range of clients on data privacy and cybersecurity-related matters.

As the General Counsel of the American Chamber of Commerce in China (AmCham China), Ashwin serves as a senior officer of the organization and as an ex officio member of its Board of Governors, supporting nearly one thousand member companies in developing their businesses in China and advocating for their needs with China’s central and local governments.