On October 1, 2020, the Hamburg Data Protection Authority (“Hamburg DPA”) fined H&M, the Swedish clothing company, over €35 million for illegally surveilling employees at its service center in Nuremberg.  This fine is the largest financial penalty issued by a German DPA to date for a violation of the European General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”), and the second highest in Europe issued by any DPA (although other DPAs have announced their intention to issue other larger fines).

According to a statement issued by the Hamburg regulator, H&M acquired “extensive recordings of the private-life circumstances” of several hundred employees at the service center since 2014.  This information included details of employees’ holiday experiences, symptoms of illness and diagnoses, family issues and religious beliefs.  H&M recorded this information during one-on-one “Welcome Back Talks” following periods of sick leave or vacation, as well as during additional one-on-one meetings and corridor discussions.  The company permanently saved the information on a network drive that “up to 50 other managers” could access.  H&M used all of this information in “meticulous” performance evaluations; more broadly, it served to “obtain a profile of the employees for measures and decisions in the employment relationship”.

As with so many compliance failings, this issue came to light because of a security breach.  H&M discovered a security breach in October 2019 when a configuration error made the information about employees accessible, company-wide, for several hours.  On learning about the breach, the Commissioner of the Hamburg DPA ordered that the contents of the network drive be frozen and subsequently released.  The DPA then initiated an investigation.

In its announcement about the decision, the Hamburg DPA stated that the combination of research into employees’ private lives and the ongoing recording of activities led to a “particularly intensive interference” with employees’ rights.  He also added that the amount of the fine was appropriate to deter companies from similar privacy violations.

In an online statement, H&M said it will review the decision carefully.  Meanwhile, it has issued an apology to all employees affected and announced that those employed at the service center for at least one month since May 2018, when the GDPR came into force, will receive financial compensation.  We will continue to monitor developments.

Photo of Lars Lensdorf Lars Lensdorf

Lars Lensdorf is a partner in the Frankfurt office. He focuses on IT law, outsourcing, cloud-services, digitalization/ industry 4.0, IT related bank regulatory matters, IT-compliance, incl. cybersecurity and data protection.

Furthermore, Lars is also focused on interfaces to other practice areas to the…

Lars Lensdorf is a partner in the Frankfurt office. He focuses on IT law, outsourcing, cloud-services, digitalization/ industry 4.0, IT related bank regulatory matters, IT-compliance, incl. cybersecurity and data protection.

Furthermore, Lars is also focused on interfaces to other practice areas to the extent that IT related matters are affected, e. g. regulatory requirements for banking and financial services as well as public procurement law.

Photo of Stacy Young Stacy Young

Stacy Young is an associate in the London office. She advises technology and life sciences companies across a range of privacy and regulatory issues spanning AI, clinical trials, data protection and cybersecurity.

Photo of Mark Young Mark Young

Mark Young is an experienced tech regulatory lawyer and a vice-chair of Covington’s Data Privacy and Cybersecurity Practice Group. He advises major global companies on their most challenging data privacy compliance matters and investigations. Mark also leads on EMEA cybersecurity matters at the…

Mark Young is an experienced tech regulatory lawyer and a vice-chair of Covington’s Data Privacy and Cybersecurity Practice Group. He advises major global companies on their most challenging data privacy compliance matters and investigations. Mark also leads on EMEA cybersecurity matters at the firm. In these contexts, he has worked closely with some of the world’s leading technology and life sciences companies and other multinationals.

Mark has been recognized for several years in Chambers UK as “a trusted adviser – practical, results-oriented and an expert in the field;” “fast, thorough and responsive;” “extremely pragmatic in advice on risk;” “provides thoughtful, strategic guidance and is a pleasure to work with;” has “great insight into the regulators;” and “is technologically sophisticated and advises on true issues of first impression, particularly in the field of AI.”

Drawing on over 20 years of experience, Mark specializes in:

Providing practical guidance and advising on potential exposure under GDPR and international data privacy laws in relation to innovative products and services.
Handling complex regulatory investigations and enforcement actions involving data privacy regulators in the UK, EU and globally, and advising on follow-on litigation risk.
Helping clients respond to cybersecurity incidents, including ransomware, supply chain incidents, state-sponsored attacks, insider threats, personal data breaches, and IP and trade secret theft.
Advising various clients on the EU NIS2 Directive, Cyber Resilience Act (CRA), and other emerging EU, UK, and global cybersecurity laws and regulations.
Advising life sciences companies on industry-specific data privacy issues, including clinical trials, pharmacovigilance, and digital health products and services.
Advising on data privacy compliance in relation to employees and international transfers of data in connection with white collar investigations.
Providing strategic advice and advocacy on a range of UK and EU technology law reform issues relating to data privacy, cybersecurity, eIDs, and software.
Representing clients in connection with references to the Court of Justice of the EU.