On Sunday, July 16, Russian President Vladimir Putin signed a decree putting shares of Danone Russia JSC, owned by French yogurt maker Danone, and of Baltika Brewing Company, owned by Danish brewer Carlsberg A/S, under “temporary management.”

The Kremlin has since reportedly appointed Yakub Zakriev, deputy prime minister and agriculture minister of Chechnya, as head of the Danone business.[1] Mr. Zakriev has been described as a close ally of Ramzan Kadyrov, the notorious leader of the Chechen Republic, and himself a close ally of President Putin.[2] Meanwhile, Taimuraz Bolloev, a longtime friend of Putin, has been installed as director of Carlsberg’s Baltika business.[3]

These recent seizures follow a decree Putin signed in April, laying the groundwork to expropriate, damage, or otherwise impair the investments of companies from “unfriendly” countries—including the U.S., UK, Canada, all EU member states, Japan, Singapore, and South Korea.[4] This is the second time Russia has used the decree to seize assets. Previously, Russia took control of utilities owned by Finland’s Fortum Oyj and Germany’s Uniper SE.[5]

These Russian actions demonstrate the significant risks for foreign companies that continue to operate in Russia and signal further potential asset seizures, including the possible transfer of foreign assets to regime-friendly owners. Russia’s measures appear to constitute uncompensated expropriations, for which investors could seek redress under Russia’s network of bilateral investment treaties (BITs).[6]

In prior Covington alerts, we have discussed how foreign investors in Russia can protect their investments from Russian retaliatory measures by ensuring that they have access to international arbitration, including through BITs. We also have highlighted certain key protections available under BITs that may provide recourse to foreign investors affected by Russia’s recent measures. In this alert, we focus on those protections under Russian BITs of most direct relevance to foreign investors whose assets have been expropriated or that have had the management of that investment obstructed by Russia’s actions, present and future.

Key Protections in Russian BITs

Russia has BITs in force with over 60 countries, including many EU members (such as Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Lithuania, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Romania, Slovakia, Spain, and Sweden) and countries such as Canada, Japan, Korea, Switzerland, the UK, and Ukraine. There is no BIT between Russia and the United States, but U.S. companies may nonetheless benefit from BIT protection if they hold their investments in Russia through a third country that does have a Russian BIT.

In its BITs, Russia has committed to, among other things, treat investors from the relevant countries in a fair and equitable manner, not to discriminate against such investors on the basis of nationality, not to expropriate their investments except under certain conditions and upon payment of adequate compensation, and to guarantee their right to freely transfer payments related to their investments out of Russia. All of these protections are relevant in the present context.

Russia’s Retaliatory Measures in Breach of BIT Protections

Russian retaliatory measures may constitute breaches of core protections accorded to foreign investors under Russia’s BITs. For example:

  • Russia’s seizure and/or transfer of the assets of foreign firms to regime-friendly owners may constitute an expropriation in breach of Russia’s treaty obligations.
  • All of Russia’s retaliatory measures affecting companies or their investments in Russia based on their shareholders’ “unfriendly” nationality would appear to be in breach of Russia’s obligation of non-discrimination, as well as Russia’s obligation to refrain from arbitrary, unfair, and inequitable treatment.
  • Russia’s measures may also violate the guarantee that protected foreign investors shall be able to remit the proceeds of their investment, including any proceeds resulting from a sale or liquidation.

Access to International Arbitration under Russia’s BITs

Russia’s BITs with many of the countries it considers “unfriendly” allow investors from such countries to pursue investment arbitration claims against the Russian government. As discussed in our prior alert, the scope of Russia’s consent to arbitration varies from treaty to treaty, with some treaties providing for access to international arbitration over a greater variety of disputes than others.

International arbitration under investment treaties may be the only effective remedy for many foreign investors with investments in Russia to recover the losses caused by Russia’s retaliatory measures. Arbitral awards may be enforced against certain types of Russian government assets overseas, and firms may also be able to work with their home governments to explore opportunities to enforce awards.

As Russia’s retaliatory measures continue to intensify, investors should actively analyze available protections and consider acting to preserve their rights under Russia’s BITs.

If you have any questions concerning the material discussed in this client alert, please contact the members of our International Arbitration practice.


[1] See M. Seddon, A. Stognei, and A. Klasa, “Kremlin oligarchs eye Carlsberg assets as Kadyrov ally takes over Danone unit” Financial Times (July 18, 2023), accessed at: https://www.ft.com/content/d5234953-cddf-4b64-8a55-dc749843ab5c; see also A. Liang, “Russia: Chechnya agriculture minister to run seized Danone unit,” BBC (July 19, 2023), accessed at: https://www.bbc.com/news/business-66241315.

[2] Id.

[3] Id.

[4] See TASS, “Putin signs decree on retaliatory measures over seizure of Russian assets abroad” (25 April 2023), available at: https://tass.com/economy/1609683.

Russia has previously included the following States among its list of “unfriendly countries and territories”: Albania, Andorra, Australia, Canada, all European Union member states, Iceland, Japan, Korea, Liechtenstein, Micronesia, Monaco, Montenegro, New Zealand, North Macedonia, Norway, San Marino, Singapore, Switzerland, Taiwan, the United Kingdom (including Jersey, Anguilla, the British Virgin Islands, and Gibraltar), the United States, and Ukraine. See TASS, “Russian government approves list of unfriendly countries and territories” (March 7, 2022), available at: https://tass.com/politics/1418197.

[5] See, e.g., A. Marrow, G. Stolyarov, and A. Kauranen, “Kremlin warns of more asset seizures after move against Fortum and Uniper,” Reuters (April 26, 2023), accessed at: https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/fortum-says-investigating-news-russian-asset-seizure-2023-04-26/.

[6] Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, “Russia Lays Groundwork For Nationalizing Foreign Companies Amid Fallout From Ukraine War” (March 10, 2022), available at: https://www.rferl.org/a/russia-nationalize-foreign-companies/31746695.html.

Photo of Marney Cheek Marney Cheek

Marney Cheek co-chairs Covington’s International Arbitration and Disputes practice and has advised companies, non-governmental organizations, and governments on high-stakes international disputes and legal strategy for more than 20 years.

Marney serves as both counsel and advocate before numerous international arbitral tribunals and courts…

Marney Cheek co-chairs Covington’s International Arbitration and Disputes practice and has advised companies, non-governmental organizations, and governments on high-stakes international disputes and legal strategy for more than 20 years.

Marney serves as both counsel and advocate before numerous international arbitral tribunals and courts, including the International Court of Justice and major arbitral institutions such as the AAA, ICSID, PCA, and SIAC. She represents clients in complex international business disputes, having successfully defended a client in a $1.8 billion claim filed by a collaboration partner. Ms. Cheek serves as both counsel and arbitrator in numerous investment treaty arbitrations. She is an expert on public international law and currently represents the Government of Ukraine in its landmark cases before the International Court of Justice adverse to the Russian Federation, including Allegations of Genocide under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Ukraine v. Russian Federation). In addition to leading complex investment treaty and international commercial disputes under the rules of major arbitral institutions, Marney routinely advises clients on public international law matters and issues arising under numerous multilateral treaties. She also is at the forefront of business and human rights disputes, having represented global labor unions in the first binding arbitration brought under a business and human rights compact, the Bangladesh Accord on Fire and Building Safety.

Drawing upon her experience as Associate General Counsel at the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, Marney routinely counsels clients on international trade matters and is a member of the roster of arbitrators for several U.S. free trade agreements. Her pro bono work includes representation of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, among other matters.

Marney is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and serves as a Vice President of the American Society of International Law. She has previously taught investment law at Columbia University School of Law. She is recognized as an “extraordinarily thoughtful” and “creative” lawyer with a “wealth of knowledge” on international law matters in Chambers and Legal 500.

Photo of Jonathan Gimblett Jonathan Gimblett

Jonathan Gimblett joined the firm in 2004 following a successful career in the British Diplomatic Service. His practice combines international and antitrust law, drawing on his experience of 15 years in government. Jonathan’s international practice focuses principally on investor-state arbitration and public international…

Jonathan Gimblett joined the firm in 2004 following a successful career in the British Diplomatic Service. His practice combines international and antitrust law, drawing on his experience of 15 years in government. Jonathan’s international practice focuses principally on investor-state arbitration and public international law disputes, on which he advises both states and corporate clients. He also represents clients in U.S. federal court litigation relating to international law issues, including the application of the Foreign Sovereign Immunity Act (“FSIA”). His antitrust practice embraces litigation, counseling of corporate clients, and regulatory matters.

Photo of Nikhil Gore Nikhil Gore

Nikhil V. Gore is a partner in Covington’s financial services and arbitration practices, representing sovereigns, financial institutions, and global corporations in civil and criminal investigations, as well as cross-border arbitrations and disputes.

In his financial services investigations and enforcement practice, Nikhil leads anti-financial…

Nikhil V. Gore is a partner in Covington’s financial services and arbitration practices, representing sovereigns, financial institutions, and global corporations in civil and criminal investigations, as well as cross-border arbitrations and disputes.

In his financial services investigations and enforcement practice, Nikhil leads anti-financial crime investigations, as well as a wide range of financial institution governance, control, safety and soundness, and consumer and market conduct matters. He was lead counsel for a global bank in its recent trade surveillance resolutions with U.S. bank regulators, represented another global financial institution in successfully navigating multi-year criminal and civil investigations concerning an alleged corruption scheme in Asia, and has represented regional and community banks across the country in contesting and negotiating supervisory and enforcement outcomes before the OCC, Federal Reserve, and FDIC. He also counsels clients on BSA/AML regulations, and the structure and functioning of their control, compliance, and audit frameworks.

In his disputes practice, Nikhil is part of the Covington team representing Ukraine in state-to-state arbitrations against the Russian Federation and was appointed by the Prosecutor-General of Ukraine to the Legal Task Force on Accountability for Russian War Crimes. He regularly handles treaty arbitrations and commercial disputes spanning Asia, Eastern Europe, North America, the Middle East, and Africa.

Photo of David Pinsky David Pinsky

David Pinsky is a partner in the firm’s international arbitration and litigation practices. David’s recent work includes winning a $5-billion award for Ukraine’s state-owned oil and gas company, Naftogaz, in an investment arbitration against Russia, in response to Russia’s unlawful expropriation of Naftogaz’s…

David Pinsky is a partner in the firm’s international arbitration and litigation practices. David’s recent work includes winning a $5-billion award for Ukraine’s state-owned oil and gas company, Naftogaz, in an investment arbitration against Russia, in response to Russia’s unlawful expropriation of Naftogaz’s assets upon annexing the Crimean Peninsula in 2014, as well as representing Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty in an investment dispute against Russia.

In addition to his disputes work, David also counsels clients on how to structure their cross-border investments in order to be well-positioned in case of future disputes with foreign governments, and he has advised multiple clients in connection with their exits from Russia following the Kremlin’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.

David is a member of Covington’s Management Committee, and he practices and lives in New York City.

David’s arbitration practice focuses both on investor-state and on commercial disputes, often arising in Russia and Eastern Europe and in the energy sector. He has handled administered proceedings under the ICC, SCC, LCIA, ICDR, and AAA Rules, as well as ad hoc proceedings under the UNCITRAL Rules. On the commercial side of his arbitration practice, David has particular expertise in disputes arising under the Uniform Commercial Code. In U.S. litigation, his practice focuses on international law issues, including litigation in support of arbitration and applications for discovery under 28 U.S.C. § 1782.

David also maintains an active pro bono practice, representing journalists and other media professionals who seek asylum in the United States. An émigré himself, David has won asylum and other forms of immigration relief for clients from Russia, Uzbekistan, Iran, and Afghanistan.

Before joining Covington in 2005, David lived in Moscow as a U.S. State Department-sponsored fellow where he studied the challenges facing Russia’s press.

Photo of Jeremy Wilson Jeremy Wilson

Jeremy Wilson is co-chair of the firm’s International Arbitration and Disputes Practice Group. He advises and represents parties in investor-state matters, price review disputes, and commercial arbitrations, including in both ad hoc proceedings under the UNCITRAL Rules, and institutional arbitrations under the rules of…

Jeremy Wilson is co-chair of the firm’s International Arbitration and Disputes Practice Group. He advises and represents parties in investor-state matters, price review disputes, and commercial arbitrations, including in both ad hoc proceedings under the UNCITRAL Rules, and institutional arbitrations under the rules of the ICC, SIAC, HKIAC, the SCC, the DIAC, and the LCIA, in venues around the world. Jeremy has particular experience and a proven track record advising clients in the energy, life sciences, media, and consumer brands sectors.

Chambers UK ranks Jeremy as a leading lawyer for International Arbitration, noting client comments that Jeremy “is an excellent advocate”, “legally knowledgeable, commercially astute, pragmatic and personable to boot”. Clients also comment on his “impressive analytical and tactical skills” as well as his “quick and thorough understanding of complex legal issues”, while market sources have noted that he is “excellent on the law.” Chambers also notes his industry expertise, stating that the “very accomplished and knowledgeable” Jeremy Wilson is particularly commended for handling arbitrations in the oil and gas industries. Legal 500 UK notes “Jeremy Wilson is brilliant. As an advocate he is superb – careful, lucid and sensible submissions, clearly backed by an immense amount of preparation. A well-deserved reputation of excellence.”

Who’s Who Legal (WWL) recognizes Jeremy as a Global Leader in Arbitration in 2023-2024 and Jeremy is showcased in Legal 500’s Arbitration Powerlist: UK (2023).

Photo of Clovis Trevino Clovis Trevino

Clovis Trevino is a partner in Covington’s International Arbitration Practice, specializing in high-stakes disputes before international courts and tribunals.

With over 15 years of experience, Clovis has successfully argued cases before the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and numerous arbitration tribunals worldwide. Her…

Clovis Trevino is a partner in Covington’s International Arbitration Practice, specializing in high-stakes disputes before international courts and tribunals.

With over 15 years of experience, Clovis has successfully argued cases before the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and numerous arbitration tribunals worldwide. Her expertise spans public international law, international commercial and treaty arbitration, and complex commercial litigation across a diverse range of industries, including energy, natural resources, pharmaceuticals, telecommunications, technology, and consumer goods.

Clovis also advises clients on transnational litigation in U.S. courts, particularly in the enforcement of arbitral awards. Additionally, she provides strategic counsel to investment firms and asset managers on evaluating international claims and assessing the potential outcomes of arbitration.

An adjunct professor of law at The George Washington University Law School, Clovis is a frequent speaker and writer on topics related to arbitration and international law.

Clovis has earned recognition as a “Next Generation Partner” by Legal 500 USA and a “Future Leader in Arbitration” (partner category) by Who’s Who Legal (now Lexology). She has also been named a “Rising Star” by Latinvex and the CPR Institute.

Photo of Paris Aboro Paris Aboro

Paris advises clients across a range of industries in complex international disputes, including both investor-state and commercial arbitrations, and related litigation. Her practice also includes sovereign representation before international courts.

Paris rejoined Covington from the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal, where she was the…

Paris advises clients across a range of industries in complex international disputes, including both investor-state and commercial arbitrations, and related litigation. Her practice also includes sovereign representation before international courts.

Paris rejoined Covington from the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal, where she was the Legal Advisor to Judge. O. Thomas Johnson.

Before joining the firm, Paris previously practiced as a barrister in London. In her practice as a barrister, Paris acted in a variety of litigation across a range of practice areas, including cases that involved an international or cross-border element.

Paris currently guest lectures a seminar on International Investment Law at Columbia Law School. She also maintains an active pro bono practice, with a focus on public international law advisory matters.