Companies that do business in California and meet certain revenue thresholds should continue to prepare to comply with the state’s landmark climate disclosure laws that impose reporting deadlines starting in 2026, even as a newly enacted state law gives California regulators more time and flexibility in promulgating implementing regulations.

California Governor Gavin Newsom signed Senate Bill 219 (SB 219) into law on September 27, 2024, making modest amendments to California’s two signature climate disclosure laws, SB 253 and SB 261, enacted in October 2023. SB 253, or the Climate Corporate Data Accountability Act, requires reporting entities to publicly disclose their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions beginning in 2026 for Scope 1 and 2 emissions, and 2027 for Scope 3. SB 261, the Climate-Related Financial Risk Act, requires covered entities to publish biennial reports, beginning in January 2026, that disclose climate-related financial risk and measures adopted to reduce and adapt to that risk.

Recently at Climate Week in New York, Covington hosted Senators Scott Wiener and Henry Stern, lead authors of these laws, for a candid discussion on implementation with corporate leaders. The California Senators reinforced their commitment to maintaining the current compliance dates, notwithstanding present litigation challenging the two laws in federal court, and encouraged regulated companies to engage with the California Air Resources Board (CARB) to identify high priority areas for additional regulatory clarity, including maximizing opportunities to further harmonize reporting requirements across California, the European Union (EU), and other jurisdictions.

SB 219 did not eliminate or alter substantive reporting requirements under either of the California climate disclosure laws. Nor did SB 219 delay the years in which reporting requirements begin. However, the new law did modify the 2023 statutes in several respects that are relevant for companies that will be subject to the climate disclosure laws. Regulated entities should therefore begin planning for compliance, while monitoring ongoing federal litigation challenging the laws.

For more details on key provisions and deadlines associated with each of the climate disclosure laws, please read our previous alert on preparing for compliance with California’s climate disclosure laws and our posts spotlighting SB 253 and SB 261, published when the California legislature originally passed them.

Amendments to SB 253 and SB 261

SB 219 made the following notable changes to SB 253:

  • Six-month CARB rulemaking extension: Previously, SB 253 required CARB to develop and adopt implementing regulations by January 1, 2025. SB 219 extended the deadline by which CARB must promulgate those regulations to July 1, 2025. Even so, the new law did not alter the years in which covered entities will be required to disclose emissions; it merely provided the agency with more time to propose and finalize implementing regulations.
  • Marginal change to timing of Scope 3 emissions disclosures: Under SB 253 as enacted in 2023, disclosure of Scope 3 emissions was required no later than 180 days after Scope 1 and 2 emissions were disclosed. SB 219 altered this by giving CARB discretion to prepare a schedule for disclosure of Scope 3 emissions. However, the SB 219 amendments did not change the language stating that public disclosure of Scope 3 emissions will begin in 2027.
  • Consolidated reporting at the parent level: SB 219 clarified that SB 253’s required GHG emission reports may be consolidated at the parent company level. This affords more flexibility to regulated entities. For example, a subsidiary of a parent company that qualifies as a reporting entity need not file a separate report and could instead elect to file at the parent company level.

SB 219 made additional, minor changes to SB 253, such as providing more time (90 days) for CARB or an emissions reporting organization it chooses to contract with to publish GHG emission reports on a public digital platform.

With respect to SB 261, the amendments were more minor. For instance, SB 261 originally required CARB to contract with a climate reporting organization to prepare a biennial public report on climate-related financial risk disclosures; SB 219 makes that optional. SB 219 also removed from both laws the requirement that a fee be paid “upon filing [a] disclosure.” However, the new law did not eliminate annual fee requirements themselves.

The consolidated reporting clarifications that SB 219 made to SB 253 were not necessary for SB 261 because even prior to SB 219, SB 261 expressly allowed climate-related financial risk reports to be consolidated at the parent company level. SB 261 also allows covered entities to satisfy reporting obligations through compliance with equivalent reporting requirements in other jurisdictions.

Practical Effect and Preparing for Compliance

Overall, the changes that SB 219 made to the 2023 climate disclosure laws do not significantly alter relevant obligations. Rather, the amendments primarily afford CARB more time and flexibility in crafting implementing regulations and provide some additional clarity to regulated parties regarding consolidated reporting under SB 253.

The extended deadline provided to CARB could be a double-edged sword: On one hand, covered entities now have more time to prepare strategies to engage with CARB and to consider how California’s implementing regulations can best harmonize with other reporting regimes, such as the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) in the EU. On the other hand, there may now be less time between the date CARB finalizes its regulations and the date covered entities must begin to make disclosures. With this in mind, it is important that covered entities begin preparing for compliance now and consider strategies for engagement with CARB.

Companies should also monitor and consider engaging in the ongoing updates to the GHG Protocol. New draft standards and guidance are anticipated in 2025, with opportunities for public engagement, and final updates are expected in 2026. SB 253 requires reporting entities to measure and report emissions in conformance with the GHG Protocol. These updates are thus closely linked to mandatory climate disclosure obligations in California and other jurisdictions.

Covington’s Carbon Management and Climate Mitigation practice has extensive experience and capabilities advising on climate mitigation strategies, regulatory frameworks, and agency engagement. Our global team is ready to assist clients as they engage with regulatory agencies  and prepare to comply with climate reporting rules in California, the EU, and other jurisdictions.

Photo of Jayni Hein Jayni Hein

Jayni F. Hein co-chairs the firm’s Carbon Management and Climate Mitigation industry group.

Jayni joins the firm after serving as Senior Director for Clean Energy, Infrastructure & the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) at the White House Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ).

During…

Jayni F. Hein co-chairs the firm’s Carbon Management and Climate Mitigation industry group.

Jayni joins the firm after serving as Senior Director for Clean Energy, Infrastructure & the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) at the White House Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ).

During her tenure at CEQ, she oversaw the Biden Administration’s ambitious environmental and clean energy agenda, leading work on low carbon projects and climate disclosure, and advancing the successful implementation of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (2021) and Inflation Reduction Act (2022).

Jayni has extensive experience advising clients on climate and environmental laws and regulations, including the Clean Air Act, NEPA, and Endangered Species Act, as well as corporate decarbonization goals and reporting. Leveraging her senior government experience, Jayni advises companies and investors on compliance and strategy in light of increased scrutiny of corporate climate and net-zero commitments. She advises clients on the legal and policy issues relating to ESG and climate-related regulatory requirements, investor demands, global reporting frameworks, and strategic business opportunities.

In addition, as the former senior political appointee spearheading work to revise permitting regulations and issue guidance on climate change and greenhouse gas emissions, Jayni offers clients first-hand experience with infrastructure projects that require federal and state permits and authorization. She helps clients identify new funding opportunities and successfully advance clean energy and other infrastructure projects, including onshore and offshore wind, solar, hydrogen, transmission, semiconductor, and carbon, capture, and sequestration (CCS) projects.

Clients benefit from her ability to creatively troubleshoot issues, establish relationships across government, and engage policymakers, industry, non-profit organizations, and other key stakeholders in constructive conversations around climate change, environmental justice, and corporate decarbonization goals.

Photo of W. Andrew Jack W. Andrew Jack

Andy Jack is a broad gauge corporate and securities lawyer who leads multidisciplinary teams to help clients achieve complex business objectives and solve complex business problems.

Andy often serves in outside general counsel or senior strategist roles working closely on strategic matters with…

Andy Jack is a broad gauge corporate and securities lawyer who leads multidisciplinary teams to help clients achieve complex business objectives and solve complex business problems.

Andy often serves in outside general counsel or senior strategist roles working closely on strategic matters with C-suites and boards. His practice spans mergers and acquisitions, strategic alliances and joint ventures, venture capital, capital markets, securities compliance, corporate governance counseling, crisis management and dispute settlements.

With deep experience in the energy, diversified industrials, transportation, technology, sports and hospitality industries, much of Andy’s recent transactional and advisory work focuses on issues arising from global sustainability trends and ESG considerations, including the energy transition, vehicle electrification and advanced mobility.

Some examples of this trending work include:

  • Energy
    • Structuring and negotiating joint ventures to produce sustainable aviation fuels and to develop and deploy shared resources to respond to offshore well blowouts.
    • Advising on a carbon capture project funded by the U.S. Department of Energy.
    • M&A, finance, capital raising and commercial projects for solar PV panel suppliers.
    • Representing corporate offtakers in virtual power purchase agreements to procure renewable energy in support of wind and solar power projects.
    • Advising on U.S. public policy matters affecting the energy transition.
  • Vehicle Electrification and Advanced Mobility
    • A capital markets transaction for an industry leader in advanced mobility.
    • Multiple venture capital financing rounds for an electric truck manufacturer.
    • Joint venture restructuring and M&A transactions for EV battery manufacturers.
    • Collaboration agreements among vehicle electrification technology providers and OEMs.
    • M&A of advanced vehicle components suppliers and engineering service providers.
  • Other industries
    • Advising on board governance structures to address ESG and Sustainability oversight.
    • Assisting clients in developing voluntary sustainability reports and improving SEC reports and proxy statements to address these topics.
    • Responding to shareholder proposals on various ESG issues.

Andy co-chairs the firm’s multidisciplinary global Energy Industry Group and multidisciplinary Sustainability Solutions Initiative. He also serves as pro bono outside general counsel to the American Council on Renewable Energy and as a member of the World Resources Institute Global Leadership Council. With this background and experience, Andy frequently speaks at industry conferences and publishes on these topics. He also serves as an editor of the firm’s Inside Energy & Environment blog

He is Chambers-ranked in Corporate M&A & Private Equity, where clients report that Andy “gives practical advice with commercially reasonable solutions to problems.” He also has been ranked in Legal 500, both for Energy – Renewable/Alternative and Mergers & Acquisitions.

Photo of Kevin Poloncarz Kevin Poloncarz

Kevin Poloncarz co-chairs the firm’s Environmental and Energy Practice Group, Energy Industry Group and ESG Practice.

Kevin is ranked by Chambers USA among the nation’s leading climate change attorneys and California’s leading environmental lawyers and by Chambers Global among the top climate change…

Kevin Poloncarz co-chairs the firm’s Environmental and Energy Practice Group, Energy Industry Group and ESG Practice.

Kevin is ranked by Chambers USA among the nation’s leading climate change attorneys and California’s leading environmental lawyers and by Chambers Global among the top climate change lawyers, with sources describing him as “exceptional,” “a superb attorney,” and “one of the most gifted advocates in this space in the country.”

He represents electric utilities, financial institutions, investors and companies in policy, litigation and transactional matters concerning power and carbon markets, carbon dioxide removal (CDR) technologies, carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS), sustainable aviation fuel, and clean hydrogen.

Kevin convenes the Energy Strategy Coalition, whose members include Austin Energy, Calpine Corporation, Constellation Energy Corporation, National Grid USA, New York Power Authority, NextEra Energy, Inc., Pacific Gas and Electric Company, and Sacramento Municipal Utility District. He also leads the Clean Energy Group, whose members include Austin Energy, Calpine Corporation, Consolidated Edison, Inc., Constellation Energy Corporation, Exelon Corporation, National Grid USA, New York Power Authority, Pacific Gas and Electric Company and Tenaska Energy, Inc. Both groups focus on federal environmental policy efforts affecting the power sector.

Kevin also teaches Climate Law and Policy at Stanford Law School.

Photo of Jared Gilmour Jared Gilmour

Jared Gilmour is an associate in the firm’s San Francisco office. He works in the Environmental and Energy Practice Group, advising clients on climate disclosure requirements, low-carbon fuel standards, cap-and-trade regulations, and corporate carbon-reduction and net-zero claims. His pro bono practice focuses on…

Jared Gilmour is an associate in the firm’s San Francisco office. He works in the Environmental and Energy Practice Group, advising clients on climate disclosure requirements, low-carbon fuel standards, cap-and-trade regulations, and corporate carbon-reduction and net-zero claims. His pro bono practice focuses on media freedom and criminal justice issues.

Before joining the firm, Jared worked as a U.S. Senate press secretary and journalist.