On 15 January 2025, the European Commission recommended that EU Member States review outbound investment in three critical technologies—semiconductors, AI, and quantum—with the aim of potentially creating an EUwide regime to regulate such investment. EU Member States should report to the Commission on their findings and risk assessment within 18 months. These findings would inform a future policy proposal, so any introduction of outbound investment rules in the EU is likely to be several years away.

How did we get here?

Outbound investment mechanisms aim to regulate domestic companies making outward investments of capital, expertise, and knowledge that could contribute to the ‘leakage’ of critical and sensitive  technologies to third countries. Outbound investments typically take the form of EU firms purchasing equity in non-EU entities (e.g.  through joint ventures, greenfield investments), but can also take place through less structured arrangements such as R&D cooperation or transfer of employees.

The focus on outbound investment screening has its roots in transatlantic cooperation on China policy, and specifically the desire to minimize Western technology leakage to China. In particular, the U.S. Treasury Department issued new regulation prohibiting or otherwise requiring disclosure of outbound investment—in semiconductors, AI, and quantum—in Chinese entities as well as entities in other jurisdictions that hold certain interests in Chinese companies. The regulations entered into force on 2 January 2025.

Within the EU, outbound investment control was put on agenda with the European Economic Security Strategy and a subsequent white paper on outbound investment. Before then, only a few EU countries, such as Austria and Spain would screen outbound investment, and there had been no EU-wide approach on this topic.

What does it mean?

EU Member States are requested to monitor outbound investments in three critical technologies: semiconductors, AI, and quantum. The original white paper proposal also named biotechnologies amongst suggested critical technologies to be covered by the review, but this has been dropped in the new recommendation. The recommended scope of the monitoring exercise is as follows:

  • Wide range of transactions monitored. Both direct investments resulting in economic activity conducted outside the EU (e.g., mergers, acquisitions, asset transfers, joint ventures, or venture capital transactions), as well as indirect investments made by EU firms (e.g., when conducted through a third-country investment vehicle should be monitored.
  • No monitoring of cooperation, R&D, and recruitment activities. In contrast to the white paper, the Commission no longer recommends monitoring other types of activities, such as R&D cooperation (including with academic institutions) or recruitment activities. This reflects the consultation feedback, which viewed such measures as impractical and unnecessary.
  • Country agnostic coverage. The review is global and ostensibly “country-neutral.” The Commission will establish a common methodology for identifying any prioritization of the risk assessment, which Member States will be expected to follow. Such methodology would focus on transaction parameters (e.g. involvement with Union programs, historical patterns of technology acquisitions) rather than country-specific parameters (as suggested by the white paper). However, Member States will still be able to prioritize their risk assessment of outbound investment based on the risk profiles of destination countries (such as past behavior and violations of the UN Charter).
  • Review period. The monitoring is set to cover deals from January 2021 (a narrower range from the initial proposal of 2019). The Commissions leaves open for EU Member States to consider older outbound investment of particular concern .
  • Information to be gathered. For each investment, the monitoring should identify the transaction parties and their ultimate owners, the type and value of the investment, the products, services, and business operations involved that relate to critical technologies, the date of planned or actual completion of the investment, and information about previous or contemplated future transactions.
  • Monitoring tools and exchange with stakeholders. EU Member States are requested to have adequate tools to monitor data on outbound investment, e.g., through reporting obligations to central banks. The monitoring exercise should also involve relevant stakeholders, including business, academia, and civil society.

What is going to happen next? EU Member States are requested to submit interim reports by July 2025, followed by final reports in June 2026. The Commission will thereafter discuss potential next steps within the Expert Group on Outbound Investment (formed of the Commission and relevant authorities of the 27 Member States). However, depending on evolving U.S. policy on China and coordination with Europe, it is possible that this process might be accelerated or that specific national measures may be established within Europe.

Photo of Sibel Yilmaz Sibel Yilmaz

Sibel Yilmaz advises on all aspects of competition law, foreign investment and foreign subsidies screening, with a focus on the life sciences, technology and private equity sectors.

Sibel has particular expertise in the life sciences sector and has been involved in some of…

Sibel Yilmaz advises on all aspects of competition law, foreign investment and foreign subsidies screening, with a focus on the life sciences, technology and private equity sectors.

Sibel has particular expertise in the life sciences sector and has been involved in some of the industry’s most high profile matters in recent years, including representing Novartis on its $30 billion acquisition of GSK’s oncology business, advising Takeda on its sale of certain respiratory products to AstraZeneca and representing clients in several investigations relating to alleged excessive prices and other non-competitive practices in the life science sector.

Sibel is ranked among the world’s top antitrust practitioners by Global Competition Review, who included her in their most recent 40 Under 40 survey, as well as Chambers Global. She is described as “a brilliant and promising lawyer, who is highly recommended for complex merger work” and “an exceptional talent”, “absolutely a tip for the top.”

Sibel received her LL.M. in Law and Economics from the University of Rotterdam and Master of Law from Stockholm University and is admitted to practice in Belgium and Sweden.

Photo of Ross Evans Ross Evans

Ross Evans is a leading foreign investment controls lawyer, who focuses on helping clients navigate the shifting global landscape of foreign direct investment (FDI) and national security reviews and regulations, and other regimes providing for security and public interest related geopolitical interventions in…

Ross Evans is a leading foreign investment controls lawyer, who focuses on helping clients navigate the shifting global landscape of foreign direct investment (FDI) and national security reviews and regulations, and other regimes providing for security and public interest related geopolitical interventions in corporate, commercial and financial transactions.

His practice covers foreign investment and international trade laws, encompassing FDI, national security and public interest review and approvals, inbound and outbound investment screening, and export control/sanctions matters, alongside related licensing and compliance and internal and regulator-facing investigations.

Ross regularly advises major multinational companies and a broad range of strategic and financial investors. With nearly a decade of global experience managing engagement with UK, EU and international authorities, and a deep understanding of the trade and investment issues connected to critical and strategic assets and technologies, Ross provides strategic and commercial guidance to clients, general counsel and C-suite decision makers, across industries including technology and telecommunications, infrastructure, life sciences, aerospace and defence, engineering, and financial services.

Ross frequently presents on legal developments and trends to industry bodies and trade groups in the United Kingdom and internationally. He has worked in Singapore and Stockholm, and has spent over a year on two separate secondments with a multinational technology company in London and California.

As an elected member of the National Security Committee of techUK, a technology industry trade association, Ross works alongside committee members drawn from the technology and security sector to break down the impact of new law and policy and to advance engagement and understanding between industry and government in the UK. In connection with his expertise in sensitive and emerging technologies, Ross provided industry focused input at the request of the UK Government on drafting secondary legislation and guidance in connection with the UK’s National Security and Investment Act (NSIA).

Photo of Romain Girard Romain Girard

Romain Girard advises multinational corporations and institutions on complex antitrust and foreign direct investment (FDI) regulatory matters. The Legal 500 UK recognizes Romain in the EU and Competition category, describing him as “helpful, knowledgeable and personable” and “his legal knowledge is spot on…

Romain Girard advises multinational corporations and institutions on complex antitrust and foreign direct investment (FDI) regulatory matters. The Legal 500 UK recognizes Romain in the EU and Competition category, describing him as “helpful, knowledgeable and personable” and “his legal knowledge is spot on – in particular, his awareness of legal developments in key jurisdictions across the world is very useful.”

Romain has extensive experience advising clients on all aspects of EU, UK and international antitrust and FDI matters and representing them before the European Commission, as well as UK competition authorities and courts. His practice covers multiple industries including financial institutions and private equity, telecommunications media and technology, cybersecurity, artificial intelligence, aerospace, metals and mining, automotive, defense, and life sciences.

Romain’s practice also covers international trade and EU/UK sanctions, with extensive experience navigating the complexities of these highly dynamic regimes both defensively (i.e. advising on third party audits and lawsuit), and offensively (advising on voluntary disclosures and complaints).

Photo of Bart Szewczyk Bart Szewczyk

Having served in senior advisory positions in the U.S. government, Bart Szewczyk advises on European and global public policy, particularly on technology, economic sanctions and asset seizure, trade and foreign investment, business and human rights, and environmental, social, and governance issues, as well…

Having served in senior advisory positions in the U.S. government, Bart Szewczyk advises on European and global public policy, particularly on technology, economic sanctions and asset seizure, trade and foreign investment, business and human rights, and environmental, social, and governance issues, as well as conducts international arbitration. He also teaches grand strategy as an Adjunct Professor at Sciences Po in Paris and is a Nonresident Senior Fellow at the German Marshall Fund.

Bart recently worked as Advisor on Global Affairs at the European Commission’s think-tank, where he covered a wide range of foreign policy issues, including international order, defense, geoeconomics, transatlantic relations, Russia and Eastern Europe, Middle East and North Africa, and China and Asia. Previously, between 2014 and 2017, he served as Member of Secretary John Kerry’s Policy Planning Staff at the U.S. Department of State, where he covered Europe, Eurasia, and global economic affairs. From 2016 to 2017, he also concurrently served as Senior Policy Advisor to the U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, Samantha Power, where he worked on refugee policy. He joined the U.S. government from teaching at Columbia Law School, as one of two academics selected nationwide for the Council on Foreign Relations International Affairs Fellowship. He has also consulted for the World Bank and Rasmussen Global.

Prior to government, Bart was an Associate Research Scholar and Lecturer-in-Law at Columbia Law School, where he worked on international law and U.S. foreign relations law. Before academia, he taught international law and international organizations at George Washington University Law School, and served as a visiting fellow at the EU Institute for Security Studies. He also clerked at the International Court of Justice for Judges Peter Tomka and Christopher Greenwood and at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit for the late Judge Leonard Garth.

Bart holds a Ph.D. from Cambridge University where he studied as a Gates Scholar, a J.D. from Yale Law School, an M.P.A. from Princeton University, and a B.S. in economics (summa cum laude) from The Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania. He has published in Foreign Affairs, Foreign Policy, Harvard International Law Journal, Columbia Journal of European Law, American Journal of International Law, George Washington Law Review, Survival, and elsewhere. He is the author of three books: Europe’s Grand Strategy: Navigating a New World Order (Palgrave Macmillan 2021); with David McKean, Partners of First Resort: America, Europe, and the Future of the West (Brookings Institution Press 2021); and European Sovereignty, Legitimacy, and Power (Routledge 2021).