On April 9th, President Trump issued the Restoring America’s Maritime Dominance Executive Order (“Maritime EO”), which declares that “[i]t is the policy of the United States to revitalize and rebuild domestic maritime industries and workforce to promote national security and economic prosperity.”  The Maritime EO aims to improve the nation’s commercial shipbuilding capacity and bolster the maritime workforce.  The four corners of the Maritime EO primarily take two key steps—(1) directing the National Security Adviser to prepare a Maritime Action Plan (“MAP”) to revitalize domestic maritime industries and (2) imposing a series of trade-related measures to bolster domestic shipping.  The Fact Sheet accompanying the Maritime EO further notes that President Trump has established a new Office of Maritime and Industrial Capacity at the National Security Council, which presumably will help coordinate implementation of the Maritime EO.  

While much remains to be seen on how the Maritime EO will be implemented, it is clear that the Trump administration intends to take a multifaceted approach to supporting the domestic maritime industry.  In this regard, the EO tracks and builds upon the SHIPS for America Act of 2024 (“SHIPS Act”), proposed legislation that garnered broad bipartisan support last year after its initial introduction in Congress.  The SHIPS Act was co-sponsored by then-Rep. Michael Waltz, who as the current National Security Adviser has principal responsibility for managing the development of the MAP that forms the backbone for the EO and its policy objectives.  Especially in light of the legislative momentum in this area, we expect that this initial action and any subsequent executive and legislative actions will be of significant interest to a wide range of U.S. businesses, including ship builders and their suppliers.

I. The Forthcoming Maritime Action Plan

A central part of the Maritime EO is a directive that within 210 days (i.e., by Nov. 5, 2025), the National Security Adviser develop a MAP in coordination with various agencies.  The MAP is expected to “provide a strategy with specific actions to restore and create sustained resiliency for the American maritime industry.”  The Maritime EO sketches out some of the contours of this forthcoming plan, and establishes interim milestones to support its development.  Broadly, the MAP will include three categories of items: (1) assessments and proposals for maritime industry financial incentives and subsidies; (2) acquisition reforms and deregulatory initiatives; and (3) a series of strategic reports and initiatives, including workforce initiatives.    

A. Assessments and Proposals for Maritime Industry Incentives

The Maritime EO demonstrates substantial interest in identifying and marshalling federal resources to support domestic shipbuilding.  In particular, the MAP will include an assessment of currently available authorities and resources, such as Defense Production Act Title III authorities and the Defense Department’s Office of Strategic Capital loan program, that can be used to invest in and expand the Maritime Industrial Base.  The MAP will also include a report that “inventories Federal programs that could be used to sustain and grow the supply of and demand for the United States maritime industry.”  In addition to identifying these existing authorities, the Maritime EO directs the development of legislative proposals or initiatives to finance or subsidize the maritime industry, including a proposal for a Maritime Security Trust Fund to serve as “a reliable funding source” for MAP programs and a plan to create maritime prosperity zones, modeled on the opportunity zones established pursuant to section 13823 of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (Public Law 115-97, 131 Stat. 2054).

The MAP will also detail a proposed Shipbuilding Financial Incentives Program that will have “broad flexibility to incentivize private investment in the construction of commercial components, parts, and vessels; capital improvements to commercial vessel shipyards; capital improvements to commercial vessel repair facilities and drydocks through grants; and Federal Credit Reform Act-compliant loans and loan guarantees.”  This proposal may augment or replace existing programs with similar purposes including the Small Shipyard Grant Program and the Federal Ship Financing (Title XI) Program.

Finally, the MAP will include an additional legislative proposal to increase the fleet of commercial vessels trading internationally under the flag of the United States.  This proposal is expected to detail incentives and subsidies to increase the participation of United States commercial vessels that are militarily-useful in international trade.

B. Acquisition Reforms and Deregulatory Initiatives 

The Maritime EO also directs that the MAP include proposals and findings on potential deregulatory initiatives and acquisition reforms.  First, the MAP will include two proposals for improved acquisition strategies processes for United States Government vessels, one of which will be undertaken by DOGE and the other by the Secretaries of Defense, Commerce, Transportation, and Homeland Security, and the Director of the National Science Foundation.  Second, the MAP will include a report of findings from the Secretaries of Defense, Transportation, and Homeland Security that details deregulatory initiatives pertaining to the domestic commercial maritime fleet and maritime port access.  The Fact Sheet accompanying the Maritime EO expresses a concern that “government procurement processes and over-regulation have hindered private industry’s ability to build vessels on time and on budget.”

C. Other Reports and Initiatives

The Maritime EO contemplates that the MAP will include at least two strategic reports and analyses.  First, the MAP will include a “strategy that identifies the vision, goals, and objectives necessary to secure arctic waterways and enable American prosperity in the face of evolving arctic security challenges and associated risks.”  Second, the MAP will include a report with recommendations to increase the number of participants and competitors within United States shipbuilding, and to reduce cost overruns and production delays for surface, subsurface, and unmanned programs. 

Further, the Maritime EO details workforce and other initiatives that will be included as part of the MAP.  First, the MAP will include a report with recommendations to address workforce challenges in the maritime sector through maritime educational institutions and workforce transitions.  Second, the MAP will detail actions taken by the Secretary of Transportation to modernize the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy facilities, including by improving facilities planning, and developing a 5-year capital improvement plan.  Finally, the MAP will include guidance on the funding, retention, support, and mobilization of a robust inactive reserve fleet. 

II. Global Trade Related Provisions

As described above, most of the Maritime EO’s provisions address the development and planned contents of the MAP.  However, consistent with the Trump administration’s focus on global trade, the remaining provisions—Sections 5 through 7—target maritime trade policy and enforcement.  These directives include: (1) instructions to the United States Trade Representative (“USTR”) regarding an investigation of certain actions by China; (2) directives related to the enforcement of the Harbor Maintenance Fee and other levies on foreign-origin cargo; and (3) instructions on coordinating U.S. maritime trade policy with global partners.

A. Instructions to the United States Trade Representative

The Maritime EO expects that the USTR will continue its Section 301 unfair foreign trade practices investigation of China’s targeting of the maritime, logistics, and shipbuilding sectors and coordinate its investigation and enforcement actions with relevant federal agencies and agency heads, including the Attorney General and Secretary of Homeland Security.  The Maritime EO also directs the USTR to consider tariffs on ship-to-shore cranes and other cargo handling equipment based on its investigation findings. Pursuant to statute, USTR must finalize the Section 301 remedies targeting Chinese shipbuilding by April 17, 2025. Covington has previously detailed this investigation in a prior post.

B. Harbor Maintenance Fee Collection and Enforcement

The Maritime EO identifies a concern with foreign-origin cargo carriers that circumvent the Harbor Maintenance Fee (“HMF”) on imported goods through the practice of making port in Canada or Mexico and sending their cargo into the United States through land borders.  The Maritime EO directs the Secretary of Homeland Security to “take all necessary steps,” including introduction of new legislation, to: (1) require all foreign-origin cargo arriving by vessel to clear the Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”) entry process at a United States port of entry and (2) assess all applicable fees, including both the HMF and a 10% service fee, on any foreign-origin cargo first arriving by vessel to North America that clears the CBP process at an inland location from Canada or Mexico.

C. Align Trade Policies with “Allies and Partners”

Finally, the Maritime EO seeks to align the Section 301 and HMF policies described above with the policies of the United States’ international partners.  Within 90 days of the Maritime EO (i.e., July 8th), the USTR, in consultation with the Secretaries of State and Commerce, must “engage treaty allies, partners, and other like-minded countries around the world with respect to their potential imposition of any actions taken pursuant to” the Maritime EO’s Section 301 and HMF provisions. The USTR must also deliver an engagement plan and progress report to the President.

Photo of Scott A. Freling Scott A. Freling

Scott Freling divides his practice between representing civilian and defense contractors in traditional government contracts matters and guiding buyers and sellers—including a number of leading private equity firms—through the regulatory aspects of complex government contracts M&A deals. Scott co-chairs the firm’s Government Contracts…

Scott Freling divides his practice between representing civilian and defense contractors in traditional government contracts matters and guiding buyers and sellers—including a number of leading private equity firms—through the regulatory aspects of complex government contracts M&A deals. Scott co-chairs the firm’s Government Contracts practice.

Scott is sought after for his regulatory expertise and his ability to apply that knowledge to the transactional environment. Scott has deep experience leading classified and unclassified due diligence reviews of government contractors, negotiating transaction documents, and assisting with integration and other post-closing activities. He has been the lead government contracts lawyer in dozens of M&A deals, with a combined value of more than $79 billion. This has included Warburg Pincus and Berkshire Partners’ pending deal to acquire TRIUMPH for approximately $3 billion, Advent’s acquisition of Maxar Technologies for $6.4 billion, Aptiv’s acquisition of Wind River for $3.5 billion, and Veritas Capital’s sale of Alion Science and Technology to Huntington Ingalls for $1.65 billion.

Scott also represents contractors at all stages of the procurement process and in their dealings with federal, state, and local government customers. He handles a wide range of government contracts matters, including compliance counseling, claims, disputes, audits, and investigations. In addition, Scott counsels clients on risk mitigation strategies, including obtaining SAFETY Act liability protection for anti-terrorism technologies.

Scott has been recognized by Law360 as a MVP in government contracts. He is a past co-chair of the Mergers and Acquisitions Committee of the ABA’s Public Contract Law Section.

Photo of Michael Wagner Michael Wagner

Mike Wagner represents companies and individuals in complex compliance and enforcement matters arising in the public procurement context. Combining deep regulatory expertise and extensive investigations experience, Mike helps government contractors navigate detailed procurement rules and achieve the efficient resolution of government investigations and…

Mike Wagner represents companies and individuals in complex compliance and enforcement matters arising in the public procurement context. Combining deep regulatory expertise and extensive investigations experience, Mike helps government contractors navigate detailed procurement rules and achieve the efficient resolution of government investigations and enforcement actions.

Mike regularly represents contractors in federal and state compliance and enforcement matters relating to a range of procurement laws and regulations. He has particular experience handling investigations and litigation brought under the civil False Claims Act, and he routinely counsels government contractors on mandatory and voluntary disclosure considerations under the FAR, DFARS, and related regulatory regimes. He also represents contractors in high-stakes suspension and debarment matters at the federal and state levels, and he has served as Co-Chair of the ABA Suspension & Debarment Committee and is principal editor of the American Bar Association’s Practitioner’s Guide to Suspension & Debarment (4th ed.) (2018).

Mike also has extensive experience representing companies pursuing and negotiating grants, cooperative agreements, and Other Transaction Authority agreements (OTAs). In this regard, he has particular familiarity with the semiconductor and clean energy industries, and he has devoted substantial time in recent years to advising clients on strategic considerations for pursuing opportunities under the CHIPS Act, Inflation Reduction Act, and Bipartisan Infrastructure Law.

In his counseling practice, Mike regularly advises government contractors and suppliers on best practices for managing the rapidly-evolving array of cybersecurity and supply chain security rules and requirements. In particular, he helps companies assess and navigate domestic preference and country-of-origin requirements under the Buy American Act (BAA), Trade Agreements Act (TAA), Berry Amendment, and DOD Specialty Metals regulation. He also assists clients in managing product and information security considerations related to overseas manufacture and development of Information and Communication Technologies & Services (ICTS).

Mike serves on Covington’s Hiring Committee and is Co-Chair of the firm’s Summer Associate Program. He is a frequent writer and speaker on issues relating to procurement fraud and contractor responsibility, and he has served as an adjunct professor at the George Washington University Law School.

Photo of Martin Levy Martin Levy

Martin Levy is an associate in the firm’s Washington office and a member of the Government Contracts Practice Group.

Martin has a particular focus on industrial policy matters and helps clients navigate the legal and compliance issues applicable to organizations and projects that…

Martin Levy is an associate in the firm’s Washington office and a member of the Government Contracts Practice Group.

Martin has a particular focus on industrial policy matters and helps clients navigate the legal and compliance issues applicable to organizations and projects that utilize federal incentives, grants, and loans under the Inflation Reduction Act, the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, and the CHIPS and Science Act. Additionally, Martin works with clients to navigate domestic preference requirements under the Build America, Buy America Act, and prevailing wage standards under the Davis-Bacon and Related Acts.

Martin also has extensive experience advising on environmental and climate policy issues, including greenhouse gas regulatory requirements and international standards. Martin maintains an active pro bono practice advising non-governmental organizations, community organizations, and state and local governments on compliance issues associated with utilizing federal financial assistance.

Before joining Covington, Martin was a vetting attorney with the Biden-Harris Presidential Transition, a law clerk at the Eastern District of New York, and an undergraduate environmental law instructor at Boston College.

Photo of Homer La Rue Homer La Rue

Homer La Rue is an associate in the firm’s Washington, DC office and a member of the Government Contracts Practice Group. Drawing on his experience in industry and at the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD), Homer advises a diverse mix of clients on…

Homer La Rue is an associate in the firm’s Washington, DC office and a member of the Government Contracts Practice Group. Drawing on his experience in industry and at the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD), Homer advises a diverse mix of clients on a broad range of matters related to government contracting, including: complex regulatory compliance matters, high-stakes investigations, enforcement actions, corporate transactions, and prime contractor / subcontractor disputes. Prior to joining the firm, Homer spent over a decade at the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) working in support of key Defense and Intelligence Community buying commands. As a warranted Corporate Administrative Contracting Officer (CACO), Homer’s duties included a wide range of enterprise-wide contract administration and audit resolution functions.

Homer also maintains an active pro bono practice focused on indigent criminal defense.