Much of the attention on the European Commission’s recent proposal for a Cloud and AI Development Act (“CADA Proposal”) has focused on its proposed cloud sovereignty framework, the implications for cloud service providers and public sector cloud use, and the mechanisms intended to encourage data centre development in the EU (we discuss those aspects of the CADA Proposal in more detail in our post here).

But the CADA Proposal also contains several express references to the development of the EU quantum computing sector, which suggests that quantum computing may be embedded within the EU’s wider cloud, AI, and data centre strategy, and that the Commission may promote the development of the technology in that context (rather than treating it as a separate technology policy issue). That approach is consistent with the Commission’s July 2025 Quantum Strategy and its expected proposal for a Quantum Act later this year, both of which focus on building the industrial base for quantum computers in Europe (we describe the Quantum Strategy and the likely themes of the forthcoming Quantum Act in our prior post here).

In this post, we outline the two main mechanisms through which the CADA Proposal would support the development and deployment of quantum computing in Europe, in advance of the Quantum Act.

  1. EU- and Member State-level Cloud and AI strategies have a specific mandate to develop and invest in the European quantum sector

The CADA Proposal would make quantum development a required element of Member State cloud and AI planning. Article 7 would require each Member State to adopt a national cloud and AI strategy within one year of the Regulation’s entry into force. Those strategies would need to include measures to invest in “high-intensity computing infrastructure,” including quantum computers, as strategic national and cross-border assets supporting research, development, and industrial AI deployment. Formulated this way, the Proposal does not treat quantum computing development as a separate policy issue. Instead, it acknowledges the value of quantum computing as an important tool for developing other frontier technologies, and includes it within the same infrastructure planning framework as other assets used to develop compute capacity in the EU.

The Proposal would also establish “Cloud and AI Leadership Initiatives” that contain eight “Operational Objectives” the European Commission and Member States (alongside any “joint undertakings”) are tasked with implementing. The CADA Proposal requires these operational objectives to be implemented through “large-scale, cross-sectoral initiatives addressing major technological and industrial challenges of strategic relevance for the Union,” (“Grand Challenges”). Two are directly relevant to quantum computing:

  • Operational Objective 1—related to supporting the development and deployment of advanced data centre technologies: Expressly requires the Commission and Member States to “promote the integration of emerging quantum computing technologies for cloud and AI computing infrastructure operations,” similar to the requirements for Member State cloud and AI development strategies. The corresponding Grand Challenge 1 emphasizes the use of quantum computing technologies for cloud and compute infrastructure as a means of improving the Power Usage Effectiveness of cloud and edge data centres, and for improving the resilience of data centres’ value chain and supply by using EU-manufactured quantum technologies.
  • Operational Objective 2—requiring support for “the development and deployment of cloud computing stacks supporting the Union’s technological autonomy”: Requires the development of “AI-optimised servers and baseline software based on processors, accelerators, and quantum accelerators designed and manufactured in the Union.” Grand Challenge 2 refers more specifically to building AI servers powered by semiconductors and quantum technologies designed and manufactured in the EU for distributed cloud and AI computing.
  1. 2. Data centre development projects with a quantum computing focus can be designated as “strategic projects” and obtain associated benefits

The Proposal would create a route for data centre projects to obtain “strategic project” status, where they meet at least two of five listed criteria. One of these criteria is expressly quantum-related: it covers projects that “support[] the integration of chips, processors and accelerators, servers, or quantum computers designed and/or manufactured in the Union into data centre systems or data centre facility management.”

The benefits of designation as a strategic project could be material, and are intended to encourage data centre operators to consider the integration of EU-designed or manufactured quantum computers into their systems. Strategic data centre projects would, under the CADA Proposal, be eligible for the proposed EU “competitiveness seal” under the proposed European Competitiveness Fund, and could therefore be eligible for funding under that programme and, potentially, streamlined permitting processes.

*            *            *

Covington’s Technology Regulatory and Public Policy Practices will continue to monitor developments related to the CADA Proposal, and those related to the EU quantum computing sector. If you have any questions about the issues raised in this blog, or are interested in engaging with the legislative process, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Photo of Paul Maynard Paul Maynard

Paul Maynard is special counsel in the technology regulatory group in the London office. He focuses on advising clients on all aspects of UK and European privacy and cybersecurity law relating to complex and innovative technologies such as adtech, cloud computing and online…

Paul Maynard is special counsel in the technology regulatory group in the London office. He focuses on advising clients on all aspects of UK and European privacy and cybersecurity law relating to complex and innovative technologies such as adtech, cloud computing and online platforms. He also advises clients on how to respond to law enforcement demands, particularly where such demands are made across borders.

Paul advises emerging and established companies in various sectors, including online retail, software and education technology. His practice covers advice on new legislative proposals, for example on e-privacy and cross-border law enforcement access to data; advice on existing but rapidly-changing rules, such the GDPR and cross-border data transfer rules; and on regulatory investigations in cases of alleged non-compliance, including in relation to online advertising and cybersecurity.

Photo of Jadzia Pierce Jadzia Pierce

Jadzia Pierce advises clients developing and deploying technology on a range of regulatory matters, including the intersection of AI governance and data protection. Jadzia draws on her experience in senior in house leadership roles and extensive, hands on engagement with regulators worldwide. Prior…

Jadzia Pierce advises clients developing and deploying technology on a range of regulatory matters, including the intersection of AI governance and data protection. Jadzia draws on her experience in senior in house leadership roles and extensive, hands on engagement with regulators worldwide. Prior to rejoining Covington in 2026, Jadzia served as Global Data Protection Officer at Microsoft, where she oversaw and advised on the company’s GDPR/UK GDPR program and acted as a primary point of contact for supervisory authorities on matters including AI, children’s data, advertising, and data subject rights.

Jadzia previously was Director of Microsoft’s Global Privacy Policy function and served as Associate General Counsel for Cybersecurity at McKinsey & Company. She began her career at Covington, advising Fortune 100 companies on privacy, cybersecurity, incident preparedness and response, investigations, and data driven transactions.

At Covington, Jadzia helps clients operationalize defensible, scalable approaches to AI enabled products and services, aligning privacy and security obligations with rapidly evolving regulatory frameworks across jurisdictions—with a particular focus on anticipating enforcement trends and navigating inter regulator dynamics.