February 2011

In this third post on the forthcoming HIPAA/HITECH regulations, we will discuss potential modifications to the rules regarding authorization for future research.  In earlier posts, we covered the Department of Health and Human Service’s (HHS) proposed treatment of communications about currently prescribed drugs and remunerated treatment communications.  Future Research In the proposed rule issued

This is the second in our series on provisions of the HHS proposed rule implementing the HITECH Act that, if included in the final rule, are likely to have the greatest impact on the business operations of pharmaceutical and other life sciences companies.  We previously covered HHS’s proposed treatment of refill reminders and other communications

The Federal Trade Commission recently posted a frequently asked question designed to remind health care providers and health plans of their obligations when they become aware of medical identity theft.  The FAQ describes medical identity theft as occurring “when someone uses another person’s name or insurance information to get medical treatment, prescription drugs or surgery.  It

Ringleader Digital — an online advertising firm specializing in the mobile market — has agreed to settle two putative class actions that were filed against it last fall.  The plaintiffs alleged that Ringleader violated the federal Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1030, as well as various state privacy and consumer protection laws, by using HTML5 software to

On February 9, the Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) sent to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) a proposed rule to implement the requirement in the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act that individuals be given an expanded accounting of disclosures of protected health information (PHI) contained in

In a decision with implications for all California retailers, the California Supreme Court ruled [PDF] yesterday that a customer may not be asked to provide his or her ZIP code during an in-person credit card transaction.  At issue in Pineda v. Williams-Sonoma Stores, Inc. was the scope of California’s Song-Beverly Credit Card Act of 1971, Cal. Civ.