On March 26, 2025, Utah Governor Spencer Cox signed into law SB 142, the App Store Accountability Act (the “Act”), enacting the country’s first state law that requires app store providers to verify the age of all users and places obligations on app developers. An “app store provider” is defined as “a person that owns, operates, or controls an app store that allows users in [Utah] to download apps onto a mobile device.” A “developer” is defined as “a person that owns or controls an app made available through the app store in the state.”

The law goes into effect on May 7, 2025, and the obligations on app store providers and developers are not effective until May 6, 2026. Some key provisions are outlined below.

  • Age Verification and Parental Consent: The Act requires app store providers to request age information and verify the individual user’s age category at the time the individual located in the state creates an account. Additionally, the app store provider must obtain verifiable parental consent where the age verification process determines that the individual is a minor under 18 to download apps, make in-app purchases, or purchase apps.
  • Parent Account Affiliation & Verifiable Parental Consent: If the app store provider determines that an individual is a minor under the Act, the app store provider must require the account to be affiliated with a parent account. Additionally, the app store provider must obtain verifiable parental consent from the holder of the affiliated parent account holder before allowing the minor to download an app, make an in-app purchase, or purchase an app.
  • Significant Changes to Apps: App store providers must also notify users of a “significant change” to the app. For minor accounts, app store providers must notify the holder of the affiliated parent account and obtained renewed parental consent of a “significant change.” The Act includes examples of what constitutes a significant change, including a material modification to the app’s terms of service or privacy policy that alters the app’s age rating or content descriptions, among others.
  • Requirements for Developers: Developers are subject to additional requirements. For example, developers must verify through the app store’s data sharing methods the age category of users and whether verifiable parental consent has been obtained for minor accounts. Additionally, developers must notify app store providers of a significant change to the app, among other requirements.
  • Data Safeguards: The Act imposes requirements with respect to data collected and processed.  For example, app store providers must transmit personal age verification data to developers only for the purposes described in the Act using industry-standard encryption protocols.

The Utah Division of Consumer Protection must promulgate rules establishing processes and means for an app store provider to age verify users. Certain violations of the Act are a deceptive trade practice under Utah law. The Act also creates a private right of action for minors and parents against app store providers and developers for some violations of the Act.

Photo of Lindsey Tonsager Lindsey Tonsager

Lindsey Tonsager co-chairs the firm’s global Data Privacy and Cybersecurity practice. She advises clients in their strategic and proactive engagement with the Federal Trade Commission, the U.S. Congress, the California Privacy Protection Agency, and state attorneys general on proposed changes to data protection…

Lindsey Tonsager co-chairs the firm’s global Data Privacy and Cybersecurity practice. She advises clients in their strategic and proactive engagement with the Federal Trade Commission, the U.S. Congress, the California Privacy Protection Agency, and state attorneys general on proposed changes to data protection laws, and regularly represents clients in responding to investigations and enforcement actions involving their privacy and information security practices.

Lindsey’s practice focuses on helping clients launch new products and services that implicate the laws governing the use of artificial intelligence, data processing for connected devices, biometrics, online advertising, endorsements and testimonials in advertising and social media, the collection of personal information from children and students online, e-mail marketing, disclosures of video viewing information, and new technologies.

Lindsey also assesses privacy and data security risks in complex corporate transactions where personal data is a critical asset or data processing risks are otherwise material. In light of a dynamic regulatory environment where new state, federal, and international data protection laws are always on the horizon and enforcement priorities are shifting, she focuses on designing risk-based, global privacy programs for clients that can keep pace with evolving legal requirements and efficiently leverage the clients’ existing privacy policies and practices. She conducts data protection assessments to benchmark against legal requirements and industry trends and proposes practical risk mitigation measures.

Photo of Jayne Ponder Jayne Ponder

Jayne Ponder provides strategic advice to national and multinational companies across industries on existing and emerging data privacy, cybersecurity, and artificial intelligence laws and regulations.

Jayne’s practice focuses on helping clients launch and improve products and services that involve laws governing data privacy…

Jayne Ponder provides strategic advice to national and multinational companies across industries on existing and emerging data privacy, cybersecurity, and artificial intelligence laws and regulations.

Jayne’s practice focuses on helping clients launch and improve products and services that involve laws governing data privacy, artificial intelligence, sensitive data and biometrics, marketing and online advertising, connected devices, and social media. For example, Jayne regularly advises clients on the California Consumer Privacy Act, Colorado AI Act, and the developing patchwork of U.S. state data privacy and artificial intelligence laws. She advises clients on drafting consumer notices, designing consent flows and consumer choices, drafting and negotiating commercial terms, building consumer rights processes, and undertaking data protection impact assessments. In addition, she routinely partners with clients on the development of risk-based privacy and artificial intelligence governance programs that reflect the dynamic regulatory environment and incorporate practical mitigation measures.

Jayne routinely represents clients in enforcement actions brought by the Federal Trade Commission and state attorneys general, particularly in areas related to data privacy, artificial intelligence, advertising, and cybersecurity. Additionally, she helps clients to advance advocacy in rulemaking processes led by federal and state regulators on data privacy, cybersecurity, and artificial intelligence topics.

As part of her practice, Jayne also advises companies on cybersecurity incident preparedness and response, including by drafting, revising, and testing incident response plans, conducting cybersecurity gap assessments, engaging vendors, and analyzing obligations under breach notification laws following an incident.

Jayne maintains an active pro bono practice, including assisting small and nonprofit entities with data privacy topics and elder estate planning.

Photo of Natalie Maas Natalie Maas

Natalie is an associate in the firm’s San Francisco office, where she is a member of the Food, Drug, and Device, and Data Privacy and Cybersecurity Practice Groups. She advises pharmaceutical, biotechnology, medical device, and food companies on a broad range of regulatory…

Natalie is an associate in the firm’s San Francisco office, where she is a member of the Food, Drug, and Device, and Data Privacy and Cybersecurity Practice Groups. She advises pharmaceutical, biotechnology, medical device, and food companies on a broad range of regulatory and compliance issues.

Natalie also maintains an active pro bono practice, with a particular focus on health care and reproductive rights.

Photo of Divya Bhat Divya Bhat

Divya Bhat is a regulatory associate in the firm’s San Francisco office, where she is a member of the Data Privacy and Cybersecurity group. Before joining Covington, Divya clerked for Judge Kea W. Riggs in the U.S. District Court for the District of…

Divya Bhat is a regulatory associate in the firm’s San Francisco office, where she is a member of the Data Privacy and Cybersecurity group. Before joining Covington, Divya clerked for Judge Kea W. Riggs in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico. Her pro bono practice focuses on reproductive rights and immigration matters.