President Trump issued a series of executive orders (“EOs”) and presidential memoranda on Wednesday, April 9, that could impact government contractors across a broad range of industries.  Among other initiatives, these executive actions seek to reform the defense acquisition system, reinvigorate the U.S. maritime industry, and streamline foreign military sales.  The actions also reflect President Trump’s goal of catalyzing innovation and economic growth by reducing regulatory burdens, both in general and in the energy industry specifically.

We briefly summarize below the six April 9 executive actions most likely to impact government contractors.

  • The “Modernizing Defense Acquisitions and Spurring Innovation in the Defense Industrial Base” EO directs various changes to the defense acquisition system to emphasize “speed, flexibility, and execution.”  Notably, the EO requires that within 90 days the Department of Defense (“DoD”) shall review all Major Defense Acquisition Programs (“MDAPs”), and “consider[] for potential cancellation” any MDAPs that are more than 15% behind schedule or over budget, are “unable to meet any key performance parameters,” or are otherwise not aligned to DoD’s current mission priorities.  The EO also requires that within 60 days DoD shall submit to the President a plan to reform the defense acquisition process to, among other things, prioritize use of commercial solutions and DoD’s Other Transactions Authority.  Further, the EO directs DoD to “[e]liminate or revise any unnecessary supplemental regulations” in the DFARS or other regulatory compilations. For more on this EO, see our blog post here.
  • The “Restoring America’s Maritime Dominance” EO directs a series of actions aimed at revitalizing U.S. maritime industries.  The EO focuses on identifying means to:  (1) increase U.S. shipbuilding capacity; (2) reduce the costs of domestic shipbuilding, including by lowering barriers to federal funding; (3) make U.S.-flagged and built vessels more commercially competitive; (4) bolster America’s maritime manufacturing capabilities (referred to as the Maritime Industrial Base); and (5) strengthen the maritime-relevant workforce.  A key focus of the EO is the development of a Maritime Action Plan (“MAP”) to achieve the policy set forth in the EO.  The MAP, which must be submitted to the President within 210 days of the EO, will include at least three financing initiatives:  a maritime security trust fund, a shipbuilding financial incentives program, and “maritime prosperity zones” to facilitate and incentivize investment. For more on this EO, see our blog post here.
  • The “Reforming Foreign Defense Sales to Improve Speed and Accountability” EO directs DoD and the Department of State to reform the foreign defense sales systems with the goal of:  (1) improving accountability and transparency in foreign defense sales systems; (2) expediting the foreign defense sales process through “parallel decision-making”; (3) reducing rules and regulations for foreign defense sales and transfer cases; and (4) increasing collaboration with and revitalizing the Defense Industrial Base.  The EO seeks to reduce congressional review and export restrictions on the transfer of certain sensitive defense articles, expand the ability of foreign allies to procure defense items, and place a new emphasis on cost and burden-sharing by allies.  For more on this EO, see our blog post here.
  • The “Reducing Anti-Competitive Regulatory Barriers” EO directs agency heads to review regulations subject to their rulemaking authority to identify any that impose anticompetitive restraints, including regulations that “unnecessarily burden the agency’s procurement processes, thereby limiting companies’ ability to compete for procurements[.]”  By June 18, 2025, agency heads must provide the Chairman of the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) and the Attorney General with a list of regulations identified, and by September 16, 2025, the FTC Chairman must submit to OMB a consolidated list of regulations that warrant rescission or modification to be considered for incorporation in the Unified Regulatory Agenda developed pursuant to EO 14219.  The EO also directs the FTC Chairman to seek public input on regulations that impose anticompetitive restraints.
  • The “Zero-Based Regulatory Budgeting to Unleash American Energy” EO seeks to rescind outdated or superfluous energy regulations by imposing automatic expiration dates on existing and future rules.  Covered agencies must issue a “sunset rule” by September 30, 2025, inserting a “conditional sunset date” into each regulation within the EO’s scope.  Unless the agency formally extends the regulation through a public process evaluating costs and benefits, the regulation will automatically lapse one year after the sunset rule’s effective date and be removed from the Code of Federal Regulations.  The EO applies to regulations implementing a broad array of energy-related subjects, including nuclear energy, energy efficiency, fossil fuel and electric power markets, renewable energy, and environmental protections implicated by large energy infrastructure.  The EO also encompasses offshore energy development and federal land and mineral management.  The EO does not apply to statutory permitting regimes.
Photo of Scott A. Freling Scott A. Freling

Scott Freling divides his practice between representing civilian and defense contractors in traditional government contracts matters and guiding buyers and sellers—including a number of leading private equity firms—through the regulatory aspects of complex government contracts M&A deals. Scott co-chairs the firm’s Government Contracts…

Scott Freling divides his practice between representing civilian and defense contractors in traditional government contracts matters and guiding buyers and sellers—including a number of leading private equity firms—through the regulatory aspects of complex government contracts M&A deals. Scott co-chairs the firm’s Government Contracts practice.

Scott is sought after for his regulatory expertise and his ability to apply that knowledge to the transactional environment. Scott has deep experience leading classified and unclassified due diligence reviews of government contractors, negotiating transaction documents, and assisting with integration and other post-closing activities. He has been the lead government contracts lawyer in dozens of M&A deals, with a combined value of more than $79 billion. This has included Warburg Pincus and Berkshire Partners’ pending deal to acquire TRIUMPH for approximately $3 billion, Advent’s acquisition of Maxar Technologies for $6.4 billion, Aptiv’s acquisition of Wind River for $3.5 billion, and Veritas Capital’s sale of Alion Science and Technology to Huntington Ingalls for $1.65 billion.

Scott also represents contractors at all stages of the procurement process and in their dealings with federal, state, and local government customers. He handles a wide range of government contracts matters, including compliance counseling, claims, disputes, audits, and investigations. In addition, Scott counsels clients on risk mitigation strategies, including obtaining SAFETY Act liability protection for anti-terrorism technologies.

Scott has been recognized by Law360 as a MVP in government contracts. He is a past co-chair of the Mergers and Acquisitions Committee of the ABA’s Public Contract Law Section.

Photo of Kayleigh Scalzo Kayleigh Scalzo

Ranked by Chambers USA among government contracts practitioners, Kayleigh Scalzo represents government contractors in bid protests and other high-stakes litigation matters with the government and other private parties. She has litigated bid protests in a wide variety of forums, including the Government Accountability…

Ranked by Chambers USA among government contracts practitioners, Kayleigh Scalzo represents government contractors in bid protests and other high-stakes litigation matters with the government and other private parties. She has litigated bid protests in a wide variety of forums, including the Government Accountability Office, U.S. Court of Federal Claims, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, FAA Office of Dispute Resolution for Acquisition, federal and state agencies, and state courts.

Kayleigh a co-chair of the American Bar Association Public Contract Law Section’s Bid Protest Committee. She is also a frequent speaker on bid protest issues.

Kayleigh maintains an active pro bono practice focused on immigration issues and gender rights.

Photo of Michael Wagner Michael Wagner

Mike Wagner represents companies and individuals in complex compliance and enforcement matters arising in the public procurement context. Combining deep regulatory expertise and extensive investigations experience, Mike helps government contractors navigate detailed procurement rules and achieve the efficient resolution of government investigations and…

Mike Wagner represents companies and individuals in complex compliance and enforcement matters arising in the public procurement context. Combining deep regulatory expertise and extensive investigations experience, Mike helps government contractors navigate detailed procurement rules and achieve the efficient resolution of government investigations and enforcement actions.

Mike regularly represents contractors in federal and state compliance and enforcement matters relating to a range of procurement laws and regulations. He has particular experience handling investigations and litigation brought under the civil False Claims Act, and he routinely counsels government contractors on mandatory and voluntary disclosure considerations under the FAR, DFARS, and related regulatory regimes. He also represents contractors in high-stakes suspension and debarment matters at the federal and state levels, and he has served as Co-Chair of the ABA Suspension & Debarment Committee and is principal editor of the American Bar Association’s Practitioner’s Guide to Suspension & Debarment (4th ed.) (2018).

Mike also has extensive experience representing companies pursuing and negotiating grants, cooperative agreements, and Other Transaction Authority agreements (OTAs). In this regard, he has particular familiarity with the semiconductor and clean energy industries, and he has devoted substantial time in recent years to advising clients on strategic considerations for pursuing opportunities under the CHIPS Act, Inflation Reduction Act, and Bipartisan Infrastructure Law.

In his counseling practice, Mike regularly advises government contractors and suppliers on best practices for managing the rapidly-evolving array of cybersecurity and supply chain security rules and requirements. In particular, he helps companies assess and navigate domestic preference and country-of-origin requirements under the Buy American Act (BAA), Trade Agreements Act (TAA), Berry Amendment, and DOD Specialty Metals regulation. He also assists clients in managing product and information security considerations related to overseas manufacture and development of Information and Communication Technologies & Services (ICTS).

Mike serves on Covington’s Hiring Committee and is Co-Chair of the firm’s Summer Associate Program. He is a frequent writer and speaker on issues relating to procurement fraud and contractor responsibility, and he has served as an adjunct professor at the George Washington University Law School.

Photo of Stephanie Barna Stephanie Barna

Stephanie Barna draws on over three decades of U.S. military and government service to provide advisory and advocacy support and counseling to clients facing policy and political challenges in the aerospace and defense sectors.

Prior to joining the firm, Stephanie was a senior…

Stephanie Barna draws on over three decades of U.S. military and government service to provide advisory and advocacy support and counseling to clients facing policy and political challenges in the aerospace and defense sectors.

Prior to joining the firm, Stephanie was a senior leader on Capitol Hill and in the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD). Most recently, she was General Counsel of the Senate Armed Services Committee, where she was responsible for the annual $740 billion National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). Additionally, she managed the Senate confirmation of three- and four-star military officers and civilians nominated by the President for appointment to senior political positions in DoD and the Department of Energy’s national security nuclear enterprise, and was the Committee’s lead for investigations.

Previously, as a senior executive in the Office of the Army General Counsel, Stephanie served as a legal advisor to three Army Secretaries. In 2014, Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel appointed her to be the Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Manpower and Reserve Affairs. In that role, she was a principal advisor to the Secretary of Defense on all matters relating to civilian and military personnel, reserve integration, military community and family policy, and Total Force manpower and resources. Stephanie was later appointed by Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis to perform the duties of the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, responsible for programs and funding of more than $35 billion.

Stephanie was also previously the Deputy General Counsel for Operations and Personnel in the Office of the Army General Counsel. She led a team of senior lawyers in resolving the full spectrum of issues arising from Army wartime operations and the life cycle of Army military and civilian personnel. Stephanie was also a personal advisor to the Army Secretary on his institutional reorganization and business transformation initiatives and acted for the Secretary in investigating irregularities in fielding of the Multiple Launch Rocket System and classified contracts. She also played a key role in a number of high-profile personnel investigations, including the WikiLeaks breach. Prior to her appointment as Deputy, she was Associate Deputy General Counsel (Operations and Personnel) and Acting Deputy General Counsel.

Stephanie is a retired Colonel in the U.S. Army and served in the U.S. Army Judge Advocate General’s Corps as an Assistant to the General Counsel, Office of the Army General Counsel; Deputy Staff Judge Advocate, U.S. Army Special Forces Command (Airborne); Special Assistant to the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Manpower & Reserve Affairs); and General Law Attorney, Administrative Law Division.

Stephanie was selected by the National Academy of Public Administration for inclusion in its 2022 Class of Academy Fellows, in recognition of her years of public administration service and expertise.

Photo of Hunter Bennett Hunter Bennett

Hunter Bennett regularly represents government contractors in bid protests before the Government Accountability Office and the U.S. Court of Federal Claims. He also counsels clients in a wide range of formation and disputes issues. Prior to entering private practice, he served as a…

Hunter Bennett regularly represents government contractors in bid protests before the Government Accountability Office and the U.S. Court of Federal Claims. He also counsels clients in a wide range of formation and disputes issues. Prior to entering private practice, he served as a Trial Attorney with the U.S. Department of Justice, where he was a member of the Department’s Bid Protest Team and frequently defended the United States against bid protests filed in the Court of Federal Claims.

During his tenure at the Department of Justice, Hunter served as lead counsel for the United States in dozens of cases involving complex commercial disputes. He also oversaw the litigation of all habeas corpus cases filed by Guantanamo Bay detainees that were pending before the Honorable Gladys Kessler in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, and personally tried five detainee habeas cases. Additionally, Hunter briefed and/or argued more than 20 cases in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Hunter began his career as a prosecutor in the Philadelphia District Attorney’s Office, where he served as lead counsel in over 200 habeas corpus cases filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, and successfully briefed and/or argued multiple cases in the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.

In his spare time, Hunter plays bass guitar in the band Dot Dash, whose song “Shopworn Excuse” was dubbed “a jangly piece of heaven” by USA Today.

Photo of Peter Terenzio Peter Terenzio

Peter Terenzio routinely advises clients regarding the multiple regulatory regimes that apply to federal contractors. His practice also extends outside of traditional government procurement contracts to include federal grants and Other Transaction Authority (OTA) research, prototype, and production agreements.

Among other things, Peter…

Peter Terenzio routinely advises clients regarding the multiple regulatory regimes that apply to federal contractors. His practice also extends outside of traditional government procurement contracts to include federal grants and Other Transaction Authority (OTA) research, prototype, and production agreements.

Among other things, Peter regularly helps clients with the constantly evolving domestic-preference requirements promulgated pursuant to various federal laws, including, for example, the Buy American Act (BAA) and Trade Agreements Act (TAA), but also including more recently the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) and Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA). He also has particular experience with helping clients navigate the complicated prevailing wage rules imposed by the Davis Bacon Act (DBA) and Service Contact Act (SCA). Peter has used this regulatory knowledge to help clients negotiate the specifics of their contracts, grants, and OTA agreements.

Peter also has significant experience with the disputes that may arise during the execution of government prime contracts. He knows how to work closely with the client’s subject matter experts to prepare and submit detailed requests for equitable adjustment (REAs) in order to secure much-needed price or schedule relief. Where necessary, he has assisted clients with converting their REAs into certified claims, and when disputes cannot be resolved at the Contracting Officer level, he has helped clients vindicate their contractual rights in litigation before the Boards of Contract Appeals.

Photo of Homer La Rue Homer La Rue

Homer La Rue is an associate in the firm’s Washington, DC office and a member of the Government Contracts Practice Group. Drawing on his experience in industry and at the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD), Homer advises a diverse mix of clients on…

Homer La Rue is an associate in the firm’s Washington, DC office and a member of the Government Contracts Practice Group. Drawing on his experience in industry and at the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD), Homer advises a diverse mix of clients on a broad range of matters related to government contracting, including: complex regulatory compliance matters, high-stakes investigations, enforcement actions, corporate transactions, and prime contractor / subcontractor disputes. Prior to joining the firm, Homer spent over a decade at the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) working in support of key Defense and Intelligence Community buying commands. As a warranted Corporate Administrative Contracting Officer (CACO), Homer’s duties included a wide range of enterprise-wide contract administration and audit resolution functions.

Homer also maintains an active pro bono practice focused on indigent criminal defense.

Photo of Martin Levy Martin Levy

Martin Levy is an associate in the firm’s Washington office and a member of the Government Contracts Practice Group.

Martin has a particular focus on industrial policy matters and helps clients navigate the legal and compliance issues applicable to organizations and projects that…

Martin Levy is an associate in the firm’s Washington office and a member of the Government Contracts Practice Group.

Martin has a particular focus on industrial policy matters and helps clients navigate the legal and compliance issues applicable to organizations and projects that utilize federal incentives, grants, and loans under the Inflation Reduction Act, the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, and the CHIPS and Science Act. Additionally, Martin works with clients to navigate domestic preference requirements under the Build America, Buy America Act, and prevailing wage standards under the Davis-Bacon and Related Acts.

Martin also has extensive experience advising on environmental and climate policy issues, including greenhouse gas regulatory requirements and international standards. Martin maintains an active pro bono practice advising non-governmental organizations, community organizations, and state and local governments on compliance issues associated with utilizing federal financial assistance.

Before joining Covington, Martin was a vetting attorney with the Biden-Harris Presidential Transition, a law clerk at the Eastern District of New York, and an undergraduate environmental law instructor at Boston College.

Photo of Evan Matsuda Evan Matsuda

Evan Matsuda is an associate in the firm’s Washington, DC office and a member of the firm’s Government Contracts Practice Group. He assists clients on a broad range of issues, with a focus on bid protest litigation and regulatory compliance matters. Evan also…

Evan Matsuda is an associate in the firm’s Washington, DC office and a member of the firm’s Government Contracts Practice Group. He assists clients on a broad range of issues, with a focus on bid protest litigation and regulatory compliance matters. Evan also maintains an active pro bono practice focused on international law and security.

Photo of Emma Merrill-Grubb Emma Merrill-Grubb

Emma Merrill-Grubb is an associate in the firm’s Washington, DC office and member of the Government Contracts practice group. Emma advises clients on a broad range of issues related to government contracting, including regulatory advising, bid protests, transactional matters. She maintains an active…

Emma Merrill-Grubb is an associate in the firm’s Washington, DC office and member of the Government Contracts practice group. Emma advises clients on a broad range of issues related to government contracting, including regulatory advising, bid protests, transactional matters. She maintains an active pro bono practice.

Victoria Skiera

Victoria Skiera is an associate in the firm’s Washington, DC office. She is a member of the government contracts practice group and maintains an active pro bono practice.

Ethan Syster

Ethan Syster is an associate in the firm’s Washington, DC Office. He is a member of the Government Contracts Practice Group. Ethan assists clients with a broad range of issues across all stages of the public procurement process.