By December 9, 2026, all EU Member States must update their product liability laws to align with the (new) Product Liability Directive (EU) 2024/2853 (“PLD”). The PLD imposes liability on manufacturers of products (and other relevant parties) for harm caused by defective products, regardless of fault. The PLD modernizes the current EU product liability framework and renders the framework more claimant-friendly (see our previous blog post). It is expected to lead to an increase in claims, primarily as a result of the following changes:

  • Expanding the scope of products falling within the PLD, including bringing AI and other software into scope.
  • Broader scope of recoverable damages, including psychological harm, property damage of any amount and data loss or corruption.
  • Liability beyond the point of sale, holding manufacturers responsible not only for defects at the time of sale but also for those arising while the product is under their control, such as failing to provide security and software updates.
  • Presumptions and disclosure obligations that ease the burden of proof for claimants. For example: (i) courts may presume defectiveness where damage results from an “obvious malfunction” during “reasonably foreseeable use”; (ii) presume causality where the product is defective and the damage is of a “kind typically consistent” with that defect; and (iii) presume defectiveness and/or causality where, despite disclosure, the claimant faces excessive technical difficulties and shows it is likely the product is defective or linked to the damage.
  • Greater transparency and enforcement, including requirements for publishing any final judgment delivered by the national courts of appeal or courts of last instance in proceedings pursuant to the PLD, which could create risk of follow-on litigation.

The PLD does not apply directly in Member States. Instead, each country must transpose the PLD’s rules into national law. We are monitoring how each country implements the PLD, whether through new laws, amendments, or other measures. Although the Directive aims for full harmonization, national differences can still arise, particularly in the following areas:

  • Non-material damage: The Directive leaves it to Member States to decide whether to compensate non-material harm (e.g., pain and suffering). Germany’s draft law transposing the PLD, for instance, includes such damages, while others may limit compensation to material and economic losses.
  • Development risk defense: The PLD allows Member States to retain or abolish this defense, which shields producers from liability if a defect could not have been discovered given the state of scientific and technical knowledge at the time of marketing. Germany’s draft law and the Netherlands’ draft law both retain this defense, while others may restrict or remove it.
  • Interaction with national law: The PLD co-exists with national tort and contract laws. Member States may integrate provisions into their civil codes or maintain separate product liability statutes, influencing how claims are brought. For example, Germany is planning to adopt a new law that replaces its existing Product Liability Act (Produkthaftungsgesetz). The Netherlands, by contrast, intends to integrate the PLD into its Civil Code rather than creating or amending a standalone statute.

The German draft also clarifies the relationship between the upcoming product liability regime and other sector-specific liability rules by excluding its application to certain medicinal products and referring those to the liability regime under the Medicinal Products Act (Arzneimittelgesetz) instead. This approach illustrates how Member States can preserve existing strict liability frameworks for high-risk sectors while implementing the PLD.

*             *             *

Covington advises companies on the specific steps needed to comply with the new PLD, including forthcoming national laws transposing it. We provide practical, actionable strategies tailored to your products, risk profile, and markets, while closely tracking implementation across all EU Member States. For detailed guidance or jurisdiction-specific updates, do not hesitate to contact us.

Photo of Louise Freeman Louise Freeman

Louise Freeman represents parties in complex commercial disputes and class actions, and co-chairs the firm’s Commercial Litigation and EMEA Dispute Resolution Practice Groups.

Described by Legal 500 as “one of London’s most effective partners,” Louise helps clients to navigate challenging situations in a…

Louise Freeman represents parties in complex commercial disputes and class actions, and co-chairs the firm’s Commercial Litigation and EMEA Dispute Resolution Practice Groups.

Described by Legal 500 as “one of London’s most effective partners,” Louise helps clients to navigate challenging situations in a range of industries, including technology, life sciences and financial markets. Most of her cases involve multiple parties and jurisdictions, where her strategic, dynamic advice is invaluable.

Louise also represents parties in significant competition law claims, including a number of the leading cases in England as a client noted, “Louise is really impressive. She has great instincts and is good with clients” (Chambers Global: Competition Law respondent).

Louise is also a “recognised name for complex class actions” (Legal 500), defending clients targeted in proposed opt-out and opt-in claims, as well as advising clients on multi-jurisdictional class action risks.

Client comments in Chambers Global describe Louise as “one of the savviest litigators in London” and that “Louise is absolutely outstanding. She delivers a Rolls Royce level service and clients have supreme confidence in her.”

Photo of Anna Sophia Oberschelp de Meneses Anna Sophia Oberschelp de Meneses

Anna Sophia Oberschelp de Meneses advises on EU data protection, cybersecurity, and consumer law. Her practice covers the full range of Europe’s digital regulatory framework, including GDPR, ePrivacy, NIS2, the Cyber Resilience Act, the AI Act, the Digital Services Act, the Data Act…

Anna Sophia Oberschelp de Meneses advises on EU data protection, cybersecurity, and consumer law. Her practice covers the full range of Europe’s digital regulatory framework, including GDPR, ePrivacy, NIS2, the Cyber Resilience Act, the AI Act, the Digital Services Act, the Data Act, the European Health Data Space, and EU consumer protection law, including product safety, product liability, and consumer rights legislation. She focuses on the operational side of compliance — helping clients design policies and processes, draft documentation, and build the internal frameworks needed to meet regulatory requirements in practice.

She also advises on contentious matters, drawing on experience managing investigations before national regulators and proceedings before national courts and the Court of Justice of the European Union. She works closely with Covington’s disputes teams on matters at the intersection of regulatory compliance and litigation.

Photo of Dan Cooper Dan Cooper

Daniel Cooper is co-chair of Covington’s Data Privacy and Cyber Security Practice, and advises clients on information technology regulatory and policy issues, particularly data protection, consumer protection, AI, and data security matters. He has over 20 years of experience in the field, representing…

Daniel Cooper is co-chair of Covington’s Data Privacy and Cyber Security Practice, and advises clients on information technology regulatory and policy issues, particularly data protection, consumer protection, AI, and data security matters. He has over 20 years of experience in the field, representing clients in regulatory proceedings before privacy authorities in Europe and counseling them on their global compliance and government affairs strategies. Dan regularly lectures on the topic, and was instrumental in drafting the privacy standards applied in professional sport.

According to Chambers UK, his “level of expertise is second to none, but it’s also equally paired with a keen understanding of our business and direction.” It was noted that “he is very good at calibrating and helping to gauge risk.”

Dan is qualified to practice law in the United States, the United Kingdom, Ireland and Belgium. He has also been appointed to the advisory and expert boards of privacy NGOs and agencies, such as the IAPP’s European Advisory Board, Privacy International and the European security agency, ENISA.

Photo of Moritz Hüsch Moritz Hüsch

Moritz Hüsch is partner in Covington’s Frankfurt office and co-chair of Covington’s Technology Industry Group as well as the Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Internet of Things (IoT) Practice Groups. His practice focuses on complex technology- and data-driven licensing deals and cooperations, outsourcing, commercial…

Moritz Hüsch is partner in Covington’s Frankfurt office and co-chair of Covington’s Technology Industry Group as well as the Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Internet of Things (IoT) Practice Groups. His practice focuses on complex technology- and data-driven licensing deals and cooperations, outsourcing, commercial contracts, e-commerce, m-commerce, as well as privacy and cybersecurity.

Moritz is regularly advising on issues and contracts with respect to IoT, AV, big data, digital health, and cloud-related subject matters. In addition, he regularly advises on all IP/IT-related questions in connection with M&A transactions. A particular focus of Moritz’s practice is on advising companies in the pharmaceutical, life sciences and healthcare sectors, where he regularly advises on complex licensing, data protection and IT law issues.

Moritz is regularly listed as one of the best lawyers in the areas of IP, IT, and data protection, among others, by Chambers, Legal 500, Best Lawyers in cooperation with Handelsblatt, and Wirtschaftswoche.

Photo of Paul Wolpert Paul Wolpert

Paul Wolpert is an associate in Covington’s Frankfurt office. He focuses on IT law, outsourcing, cloud-services, digitalization/industry 4.0, technology and data driven licensing deals, E-Commerce and data protection.