Many fields of finance involve complex optimization problems under strict time constraints — problems where even marginal improvements could generate immense value for firms. Could quantum computing bring such improvements? Two recent IBM studies with major financial industry participants have explored potential use cases for quantum computing in finance.

Bond Pricing

For several reasons, bonds primarily trade over-the-counter (“OTC”). The way that this is practically accomplished is that a potential buyer or seller submits a request for quote (“RFQ”) to various liquidity providers (banks or dealers) for a given quantity of a particular bond. Liquidity providers compete among themselves in a blind auction structure – they cannot see or otherwise directly respond to competitor quotes in response to an RFQ. Therefore, dealers must balance competing goals when quoting a bond: if a dealer offers a quote which is too favorable to the client, they are likely to win the trade but reap a lesser reward for doing so. If the quote is too conservative, the client will likely go elsewhere.

Because of the volume and competitive structure of RFQs, small improvements in pricing accuracy and response time can be worth huge amounts for liquidity providers. However, the “true price” of a bond at any time is determined by an immense number of variables, many of which may be structurally interrelated. Moreover, optimizing pricing additionally depends on inventory levels and associated carrying costs. These attributes, when combined with the potential gains from even marginal improvements, make it an appealing candidate for quantum computing.

Accordingly, an HSBC and IBM study recently investigated whether a mixed quantum-classical system utilizing IBM’s Heron quantum processor could yield improvements in bond pricing versus existing classical-only systems. The study is inconclusive and is mainly focused on additional areas of exploration rather than immediately-applicable performance gains.  For example, the study indicates that certain performance improvements may have been attributable to quantum noise. “Quantum noise” describes interference with the optimal operation of a quantum computer, whether caused by environmental effects or the inherent uncertainty of quantum mechanics. Quantum noise is generally viewed as a source of errors rather than encoding information. While noise can reduce overfitting issues with back-tested models (as were used here), the same effect should be obtained with conventional noise (and in this study a noiseless simulation performed worse). So, the published results are not a “Sputnik moment” for quantum computing in finance, but instead represent a study that can be built upon.

Portfolio Optimization

A separate problem which lends itself to quantum computing is that of portfolio optimization. In a sense, portfolio optimization is the basic question of asset management — given a set of constraints, what is the optimal composition of assets in a portfolio? As one might expect, determining optimal allocations from the full menu of financial instruments on a continuous basis is an extraordinarily difficult task, and one whose difficulty increases exponentially as the number of variables increases. Accordingly, working approaches to portfolio optimization depend on simplifying assumptions of varying suitability, such as normal distributions on returns and static correlations between assets.  The traditional model is easily solvable by classical computing, but adding additional constraints such as lot sizes or maximum portfolio sizes (e.g., cardinality constraints – pick 50 from 500) can easily tip the optimization problem from being trivial to being extremely difficult. Because a quantum computer can encode exponentially many states, it can (theoretically) explore the solution space in a more efficient manner. Quantum computing may also be able to avoid “local minima” — portfolio combinations which cannot be improved with small changes but which are not optimal across the full solution space. As with bond pricing, small improvements in accuracy or efficiency could translate to significant gains for market participants.

A recent study by Vanguard and IBM, again using IBM’s Heron quantum processor, aimed to benchmark a mixed classical-quantum system against current classical portfolio optimization techniques. The study used a relatively small pool of assets (109 bonds, within the 133-qubit limit of the Heron r1 chip) and benchmarked for time and accuracy against IBM’s conventional CPLEX solver. As the team acknowledged, this is a classically easy problem at this scale and could be solved within a few seconds by CPLEX or similar. However, the team found that a mixed classical-quantum approach, run both on a simulated basis and on local hardware, could perform within an acceptable level of accuracy to the classical baseline.  Intriguingly, the results also indicated that harder-to-simulate ansätze (essentially quantum circuit architecture) may perform better, further supporting potential quantum advantage at higher levels of complexity. As the team acknowledged, true quantum advantage will only be possible at a level of complexity where classical solvers fail, which again will require more sophisticated quantum computers than are currently available.

Conclusion

The HSBC and Vanguard collaborations with IBM are early steps in the exploration of how quantum processors might be used to address practical challenges in finance. Although they do not represent validation of the hypothesis, their results can be used for developing other studies for assessing the feasibility of quantum approaches to complex financial problems. The results also illustrate that (i) quantum computing will have the most impact in addressing extremely complex and difficult computational challenges, so the optimal use cases for quantum computing are more likely targeted rather than universal and (ii) research results are not always positive or conclusive, but those results are still worth sharing and can be the basis for further studies.

Covington is monitoring developments globally in this fast-growing area.

Visit Covington’s Quantum Computing web page for additional updates.  Please reach out to a member of the team with any inquiries.

Photo of Nigel Howard Nigel Howard

For over 30 years Nigel Howard has specialized in technology transactions such as M&A, strategic alliances, licensing, distribution agreements and outsourcing. Clients range from start-ups and emerging companies to international corporations. He has led negotiations of billion dollar service agreements that were critical…

For over 30 years Nigel Howard has specialized in technology transactions such as M&A, strategic alliances, licensing, distribution agreements and outsourcing. Clients range from start-ups and emerging companies to international corporations. He has led negotiations of billion dollar service agreements that were critical to his client, and successfully handled the intellectual property and data issues on over 250 venture capital and M&A transactions.

Nigel advises clients on their proprietary rights to data and global strategies for protecting these assets. He has represented companies in transactions covering the full spectrum of AI and data-related activities—including AI deployments, data capture and storage, business and operational intelligence, analytics and visualization, personalized merchandizing, and the related cloud computing services.

Nigel is a “tremendous attorney” singled out for his detail-oriented approach, according to clients interviewed by Chambers and Partners. Peer commentators note his admirable commercial awareness, which achieves business-focused results, often in the most challenging of circumstances. He uses his extensive experience with IP and technology to advise on the commercial imperatives underlying these agreements.

Nigel has been ranked by Chambers Global, Chambers USA, Legal 500, Best Lawyers in America, and Who’s Who in American Law. He is frequent speaker on AI, data, distribution, and technology legal issues. His past and current clients include American Airlines, the American Bankers Association, American Express, AstraZeneca, British Airways, Brown Brothers Harriman, Cathay Pacific, Cisco, CoBank, DoubleClick, Etihad, HPE, Farelogix, Iberia, Mars, Merck, Merrill Lynch, Microsoft, NCR, the NFL, Novartis, P&G, Philippine Airlines, Promontory Financial, Singapore Airlines, Teva, TouchTunes, UBS, and Wyeth.

Photo of Nira Pandya Nira Pandya

Nira Pandya is a member of the firm’s Technology and IP Transactions Practice Group based in Boston.

Nira advises clients on a broad range of complex commercial transactions and strategic collaborations involving technology, intellectual property, and data.

As part of the firm’s Digital…

Nira Pandya is a member of the firm’s Technology and IP Transactions Practice Group based in Boston.

Nira advises clients on a broad range of complex commercial transactions and strategic collaborations involving technology, intellectual property, and data.

As part of the firm’s Digital Health Initiative, Nira advises pharmaceutical, medical device, healthcare, and technology companies on the intellectual property and commercial considerations in collaborations and other transactions at the intersection of life sciences and technology. Her experience spans AI-enabled drug discovery and other data and tech-driven collaborations. Nira also co-leads Covington’s quantum computing initiative.

Nira is focused on delivering practical, business-aligned legal guidance — a key aspect of her approach developed during a secondment with a leading technology company. Earlier in her career, she advised startups and private/public companies on growth, funding, M&A, and other corporate matters, broadening her transactional perspective.

Watch: Nira provides insights on the Life Sciences Industry, as part of our Quantum Computing video series.

 

Photo of Benjamin Sovocool Benjamin Sovocool

Ben Sovocool is an associate in the firm’s New York office and is a member of the Corporate Practice Group. He advises clients in a range of corporate matters, including debt finance transactions, mergers and acquisitions, and financial regulatory issues.