In recent weeks, several state legislatures have amended their state comprehensive privacy laws. Some of these amendments have already been enacted into law, while others have passed their state legislature and await the governor’s signature.

Delaware HB 380

As detailed in our prior blog post, on June 16, 2026, the Delaware General Assembly passed HB 380, which would amend the Delaware Personal Data Privacy Act (DPDPA). The amendments would update the applicability threshold of the DPDPA, narrow the Act’s GLBA entity-level exemption, require binding contracts with specific provisions for selling or sharing personal data, and heighten protections against profiling, among other changes. The bill is currently awaiting the Delaware governor’s signature, and if signed, the amendments would take effect on January 1, 2027.

Connecticut SB 4

As detailed in our prior blog post, on May 27, 2026, the Connecticut governor signed SB 4 into law, amending the Connecticut Data Privacy Act (CTDPA) by requiring data brokers to register annually with the state and instructing the Commissioner of Consumer Protection to establish an accessible deletion mechanism, similar to that under the California Delete Act, by July 1, 2028. Additionally, the bill amends provisions of the CTDPA relevant to controllers more broadly, including changes to the scope of publicly available information, the purpose limitation requirement, and new requirements on use of facial recognition technology, among other changes. These changes will take effect on October 1, 2026.

Maryland HB 711

On May 31, 2026, HB 711 was enacted into law after the Maryland governor failed to sign or veto the bill. The law amends the Maryland Online Data Privacy Act by expanding the definition of sensitive data to include data inferred by a controller to indicate sensitive characteristics. The law also restricts the sale of personal data to governmental entities that, within the preceding six months, engaged in or supported civil immigration enforcement through the provision of personnel or material resources, unless an exception applies. The law took effect on July 1, 2026.

New Hampshire HB 1460

On June 19, 2026, the New Hampshire governor signed HB 1460, which amends the New Hampshire Data Privacy Act by prohibiting a controller from selling the personal data of a child, defined as an individual under the age of 13. The amendment is effective January 1, 2027.

New Jersey A5328

On June 30, 2026, the New Jersey governor signed A5328, which amends the New Jersey Data Privacy Act by prohibiting the sale of sensitive personal data, requiring data brokers (i.e., persons or legal entities that knowingly collect or purchase personal data about a consumer with whom the person or legal entity does not have a direct relationship and that sell or license that data to a third party) to register with a new public database, and setting annual data broker registration fees, which are the highest in the nation. Portions of the amendment went into effect immediately, although the data broker and data collector requirements will remain inoperative for 270 days following the date of enactment.

Photo of Libbie Canter Libbie Canter

Libbie Canter represents a wide variety of multinational companies on managing privacy, cyber security, and artificial intelligence risks, including helping clients with their most complex privacy challenges and the development of governance frameworks and processes to comply with U.S. and global privacy laws.

Libbie Canter represents a wide variety of multinational companies on managing privacy, cyber security, and artificial intelligence risks, including helping clients with their most complex privacy challenges and the development of governance frameworks and processes to comply with U.S. and global privacy laws. She routinely supports clients on their efforts to launch new products and services involving emerging technologies, and she has assisted dozens of clients with their efforts to prepare for and comply with federal and state laws, including the California Consumer Privacy Act, the Colorado AI Act, and other state laws. As part of her practice, she also regularly represents clients in strategic transactions involving personal data, cybersecurity, and artificial intelligence risk and represents clients in enforcement and litigation postures.

Libbie represents clients across industries, but she also has deep expertise in advising clients in highly-regulated sectors, including financial services and digital health companies. She counsels these companies — and their technology and advertising partners — on how to address legacy regulatory issues and the cutting edge issues that have emerged with industry innovations and data collaborations.

Chambers USA 2025 ranks Libbie in Band 3 Nationwide for both Privacy & Data Security: Privacy and Privacy & Data Security: Healthcare. Chambers USA notes, Libbie is “incredibly sharp and really thorough. She can do the nitty-gritty, in-the-weeds legal work incredibly well but she also can think of a bigger-picture business context and help to think through practical solutions.”

Photo of Jayne Ponder Jayne Ponder

Jayne Ponder provides strategic advice to national and multinational companies across industries on existing and emerging data privacy, cybersecurity, and artificial intelligence laws and regulations.

Jayne’s practice focuses on helping clients launch and improve products and services that involve laws governing data privacy…

Jayne Ponder provides strategic advice to national and multinational companies across industries on existing and emerging data privacy, cybersecurity, and artificial intelligence laws and regulations.

Jayne’s practice focuses on helping clients launch and improve products and services that involve laws governing data privacy, artificial intelligence, sensitive data and biometrics, marketing and online advertising, connected devices, and social media. For example, Jayne regularly advises clients on the California Consumer Privacy Act, Colorado AI Act, and the developing patchwork of U.S. state data privacy and artificial intelligence laws. She advises clients on drafting consumer notices, designing consent flows and consumer choices, drafting and negotiating commercial terms, building consumer rights processes, and undertaking data protection impact assessments. In addition, she routinely partners with clients on the development of risk-based privacy and artificial intelligence governance programs that reflect the dynamic regulatory environment and incorporate practical mitigation measures.

Jayne routinely represents clients in enforcement actions brought by the Federal Trade Commission and state attorneys general, particularly in areas related to data privacy, artificial intelligence, advertising, and cybersecurity. Additionally, she helps clients to advance advocacy in rulemaking processes led by federal and state regulators on data privacy, cybersecurity, and artificial intelligence topics.

As part of her practice, Jayne also advises companies on cybersecurity incident preparedness and response, including by drafting, revising, and testing incident response plans, conducting cybersecurity gap assessments, engaging vendors, and analyzing obligations under breach notification laws following an incident.

Jayne maintains an active pro bono practice, including assisting small and nonprofit entities with data privacy topics and elder estate planning.

Photo of Rosie Moss Rosie Moss

Rosie Moss is an associate in the firm’s Washington, DC office. She is a member of the Data Privacy and Cybersecurity Practice Group and the Technology and Communications Regulation Practice Group.

Rosie advises clients on a wide range of data privacy and technology…

Rosie Moss is an associate in the firm’s Washington, DC office. She is a member of the Data Privacy and Cybersecurity Practice Group and the Technology and Communications Regulation Practice Group.

Rosie advises clients on a wide range of data privacy and technology regulatory issues, including emerging artificial intelligence compliance matters. She assists clients in complying with federal and state privacy laws and Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regulations. Rosie also maintains an active pro bono practice.