In the final days of California’s 2026 legislative session, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed a series of privacy legislation spanning consumer privacy rights, data broker activities, digital platform design, and civil remedies for website privacy litigation. Governor Newsom also vetoed a privacy measure that would have imposed broad restrictions on the sale and sharing of sensitive personal information. Notable bills include:

  • SB 923 – Expanded CCPA Deletion Rights and Online Request Methods: SB 923 expands consumer deletion rights under the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”) from information collected “from” a consumer to information collected “from or about” the consumer. Additionally, SB 923 will add that a business that operates exclusively online and has a direct relationship with the consumer from whom it collects personal information must provide an email address and make an online method, such as a webform or online portal, available for submitting requests.
  • AB 2561 – Operating System and Application Privacy Settings: AB 2561 will prohibit an operating system or application from changing that user’s affirmative “privacy setting” without the user’s consent, subject to some exceptions. The law broadly defines “privacy setting” to include any user-configurable option within an application’s privacy, or similarly labeled, menu, that governs the collection, use, sharing, disclosure, retention, or processing of personal information.
  • AB 883 – Amendments to California’s Data Broker Law: AB 883 modifies California’s data broker law and requirements for the state’s Delete Request and Opt-Out Platform (“DROP”) to shorten the period within which data brokers must process applicable deletion requests submitted through DROP from every 45 days to every 30 days. AB 883 also contains provisions designed to increase awareness and use of California’s DROP mechanism by requiring certain government officials to notify other officials of their ability to submit deletion requests through the platform. Additional background on California’s Delete Act legislation establishing the framework and a recent enforcement action can be found in prior blog posts.
  • SB 690 – Reform of California Invasion of Privacy Act Litigation: As detailed in our recent blog post, SB 690 eliminates the California Invasion of Privacy Act’s (“CIPA”) private right of action as it applies to certain pen register and trap-and-trace claims, though SB 690 does not eliminate or otherwise modify other CIPA provisions frequently asserted in online-tracking disputes.
Photo of Jayne Ponder Jayne Ponder

Jayne Ponder counsels companies on the intersection of privacy, AI, and emerging technology regulation, and routinely represents clients in regulatory inquiries, investigations, and enforcement matters before federal and state agencies.

Jayne counsels clients across industries to launch and enhance products, services, and governance…

Jayne Ponder counsels companies on the intersection of privacy, AI, and emerging technology regulation, and routinely represents clients in regulatory inquiries, investigations, and enforcement matters before federal and state agencies.

Jayne counsels clients across industries to launch and enhance products, services, and governance programs involving their collection and use of data and emerging technologies. Her experience spans U.S. comprehensive privacy, automated decisionmaking, AI governance, biometric privacy, surveillance and algorithmic pricing, and AI transparency, disclosure, and safety frameworks. She partners with clients to design products and governance programs that keep pace with the dynamic regulatory environment, including in connection with digital and online advertising, social media, AI-powered and agentic services, connected devices, and robotics.

In addition, she advises companies on engagement with federal and state regulators, including through enforcement and rulemaking. Jayne analyzes privacy and security risks in complex corporate transactions. She also provides strategic input on the legislative, regulatory, and policy developments shaping the privacy and AI landscape.

Jayne maintains an active pro bono practice, focusing on assisting nonprofits with their privacy programs and elder estate planning.

Photo of Lindsey Tonsager Lindsey Tonsager

Lindsey Tonsager is a recognized leader in representing companies before federal and state regulators, and is renowned for advising on minor protection, AI, and state comprehensive privacy laws.

Lindsey chairs the firm’s global Data Privacy and Cybersecurity practice. She advises clients in their…

Lindsey Tonsager is a recognized leader in representing companies before federal and state regulators, and is renowned for advising on minor protection, AI, and state comprehensive privacy laws.

Lindsey chairs the firm’s global Data Privacy and Cybersecurity practice. She advises clients in their strategic and proactive engagement with the Federal Trade Commission, the U.S. Congress, the California Privacy Protection Agency, and State Attorneys General on proposed changes to data protection laws, and regularly represents clients in responding to investigations and enforcement actions involving their privacy and information security practices.

Lindsey’s practice focuses on helping clients launch new products and services that implicate the laws governing the use of artificial intelligence; data processing for robotics, autonomous vehicles, and other connected devices; biometrics; online advertising; the collection of personal information from children, teens, and students online; e-mail marketing; disclosures of video viewing information; and new technologies.

Lindsey also assesses privacy and data security risks in complex corporate transactions where personal data is a critical asset or data processing risks are otherwise material. In light of a dynamic regulatory environment where new state, federal, and international data protection laws are always on the horizon and enforcement priorities are shifting, she focuses on designing risk-based global privacy programs for clients that can keep pace with evolving legal requirements and efficiently leverage the clients’ existing privacy policies and practices. She conducts data protection assessments to benchmark against legal requirements and industry trends and proposes practical risk mitigation measures.

Photo of Bryan Ramirez Bryan Ramirez

Bryan Ramirez is an associate in the firm’s San Francisco office and is a member of the Data Privacy and Cybersecurity Practice Group. He advises clients on a range of regulatory and compliance issues, including compliance with state privacy laws. Bryan also maintains…

Bryan Ramirez is an associate in the firm’s San Francisco office and is a member of the Data Privacy and Cybersecurity Practice Group. He advises clients on a range of regulatory and compliance issues, including compliance with state privacy laws. Bryan also maintains an active pro bono practice.