On October 22, 2026, the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) announced its first enforcement action under new rules that prohibit FCC authorization of certain devices incorporating “logic-bearing hardware components” produced by entities identified on the FCC’s Covered List.  The rules took effect less than two weeks earlier on October 13, with the prompt action signaling the FCC’s willingness to enforce the new component-level restrictions. This action is only the latest in the FCC’s series of actions to enforce the Covered List and its national-security rules, underscoring that space as a continued enforcement priority.

The FCC’s Office of Engineering and Technology prevented two devices, a dashboard camera and a wireless video transmitter, from being marketed or sold in the United States after determining that the devices contained a chip produced by HiSilicon, a subsidiary of Huawei.  The FCC stated that HiSilicon advertises the chip as “designed for the surveillance market” and as incorporating “detection algorithms for human faces.”  Huawei is on the Covered List for specified telecommunications and video-surveillance equipment and services.

The FCC rules adopted in July 2026 were intended to close what the agency has called a “component part loophole” in its equipment-authorization regime.  Under those rules, if a device would be prohibited from receiving a new FCC equipment authorization if produced by a Covered List entity, the device also is prohibited from authorization if it incorporates a logic-bearing hardware component produced by that entity.  The rules therefore extend the Covered List restrictions beyond finished devices produced by listed entities to certain otherwise non-covered devices that incorporate covered components.

The FCC defined “logic-bearing hardware component” broadly to include a “device, system, module, sub-assembly, integrated circuit or other physical component” that uses digital techniques or radiofrequency energy to perform data-processing functions.  As a practical matter, this means that manufacturers and other parties seeking equipment authorization need to assess not only the producer of the finished device but also the provenance of smart components incorporated into it.

The component-level rules are part of a broader expansion of the FCC’s Covered List framework.  Over the past year, the FCC has also added categories of foreign-produced equipment, including uncrewed aircraft systems and critical components, consumer-grade routers, power inverters, and advanced robotic devices, to the Covered List based on national-security determinations by Executive Branch agencies.  We discussed those developments in prior Inside Global Tech posts on UAS and UAS critical components, foreign-produced routers, and power inverters and advanced robotic devices.

The new logic-bearing-component prohibition is distinct from those place-of-production-based Covered List entries: the FCC’s July order applies the component restriction to producer/provider-based Covered List determinations, such as the listing applicable to Huawei, rather than to equipment categories listed solely because they are produced in a particular location.  This first-of-its-kind enforcement action underscores the importance of component-level supply-chain diligence for manufacturers and importers of devices that require FCC authorization, particularly where products incorporate chips, processors, communications modules, or other smart components supplied by Covered List entities.

Photo of Devin DeBacker Devin DeBacker

Drawing on senior career and political roles at the White House and the Department of Justice (DOJ) across three presidential administrations, Devin DeBacker advises clients at the intersection of national security, geopolitical risk, regulatory oversight, and complex commercial transactions and technology.

Devin’s practice…

Drawing on senior career and political roles at the White House and the Department of Justice (DOJ) across three presidential administrations, Devin DeBacker advises clients at the intersection of national security, geopolitical risk, regulatory oversight, and complex commercial transactions and technology.

Devin’s practice spans the full range of investment- and transaction-based national security reviews and related regimes, including the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS); Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and Team Telecom reviews of telecommunications infrastructure, equipment, and services; the DOJ’s Data Security Program; the Department of Commerce’s Information and Communications Technology and Services (ICTS) program and related supply-chain authorities; the Department of the Treasury’s Outbound Investment Security Program; the FCC’s Covered List of prohibited foreign-produced equipment and services; and emerging and novel uses of economic national security tools such as the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) and the Defense Production Act (DPA).

From 2019 to 2026, Devin held senior roles in national security and international trade and investment in the White House and DOJ. As Associate Counsel and Special Assistant to the President in the first Trump Administration, he advised the President’s most senior aides and other White House and agency leaders on presidential actions, policies, agency regulations and actions, and other matters involving economic national security, including foreign investment, tariffs and other trade actions, cybersecurity and data privacy, and national-security controls on technology, manufacturing, and supply chains under IEEPA, the DPA, and other authorities. Later in the administration, he served as Deputy Assistant Attorney General in DOJ’s Office of Legal Counsel, where he advised the White House, DOJ leadership, and other Executive Branch lawyers and policymakers on significant regulatory, statutory, and constitutional issues involving national security, economic and trade sanctions, telecommunications, cybersecurity, and presidential authorities.

From 2022 to 2026, Devin was the Chief of the Foreign Investment Review Section in DOJ’s National Security Division, ultimately serving as the Department’s most senior career official for transactional national security matters. In that capacity, he led the Department’s regulatory national security work involving global business, investment, trade, and technology, including in more than 1,600 CFIUS reviews and over 250 Team Telecom matters while chairing Team Telecom on behalf of the Attorney General. In addition, he oversaw compliance and enforcement for more than 200 national security agreements and multiple presidential prohibitions, including several CFIUS penalties, the first FCC penalties for Team Telecom violations, the government’s first affirmative lawsuit to enforce a Presidential divestment order, and CFIUS’s intervention in multiple bankruptcy proceedings. As the lead career DOJ national security official on broader investment and transactional matters, Devin was the principal architect of DOJ’s Data Security Program (DSP) and also worked closely with other agencies in developing and implementing emerging national security authorities. These include the addition of foreign-produced drones and multiple Chinese manufacturers and service providers to the FCC’s Covered List, the ICTS ban on Kaspersky Labs and the Connected Vehicles Rule, and development of outbound investment rules, the Federal Acquisition Security Council, the Department of Defense’s 1260H List and Section 889 authority, the BIOSECURE Act, and the Federal Trade Commission’s Protecting Americans’ Data from Foreign Adversaries Act (PADFAA).

At the outset of the second Trump Administration, Devin also served as interim head of the National Security Division — the highest-ranking national security official at DOJ. He led the Division’s nearly 400 personnel during the presidential transition and helped shape early administration priorities on China, Iran, trade, foreign investment, sanctions, and export controls.

His government service was recognized by Justice Department leadership for his “exceptional EQ” in navigating “the policy dynamics within the Department, White House, and interagency,” as well as for his leadership in “spearheading some of the most significant policy initiatives” in national security that have shaped the regulatory landscape that businesses now face.

Photo of Matthew DelNero Matthew DelNero

Matt DelNero provides expert regulatory counsel to companies of all sizes in the telecommunications, technology and media sectors. As a former senior official with the FCC and longtime private practitioner, Matt helps clients achieve their goals and navigate complex regulatory and public policy…

Matt DelNero provides expert regulatory counsel to companies of all sizes in the telecommunications, technology and media sectors. As a former senior official with the FCC and longtime private practitioner, Matt helps clients achieve their goals and navigate complex regulatory and public policy challenges.

Matt serves as co-chair of Covington’s Technology & Communications Regulation (“TechComm”) Practice Group and co-chair of the firm’s Inclusion initiative.

Matt advises clients on the full range of issues impacting telecommunications, technology and media providers today, including:

Structuring and securing FCC and other regulatory approvals for media and telecommunications transactions.
Obtaining approval for foreign investment in broadcasters and telecommunications providers.
Broadband funding under federal and state programs, including under the FCC’s Universal Service Fund (USF) and NTIA’s Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) Program.
Representing broadcasters, media networks, and other content owners and producers on both existing and proposed FCC regulations and policies.
FCC enforcement actions and inquiries.
Online video accessibility, including under the Communications and Video Accessibility Act (CVAA) and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
Equipment authorizations for IoT and other devices.
Spectrum policy and auctions, including for 5G.
Privacy and data protection, with a focus on telecommunications and broadband providers.

Matt also maintains an active pro bono practice representing LGBTQ+ and other asylum seekers, as well as veterans petitioning for discharge upgrades—including discharges under ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ and predecessor policies that targeted LGBTQ+ servicemembers.

Prior to rejoining Covington in January 2017, Matt served as Chief of the FCC’s Wireline Competition Bureau. He played a leading role in development of policies around net neutrality, broadband privacy, and broadband deployment and affordability under the federal Universal Service Fund (USF).

Chambers USA ranks Matt within “Band 1” in his field and reports that he is a “go-to attorney for complex matters before the FCC and other federal agencies, drawing on impressive former government experience.” It also quotes clients who praise him as “an outstanding regulatory lawyer…[who] understands the intersection between what’s important for the client’s operations and how the law impacts those operations.”

Photo of Yaron Dori Yaron Dori

Yaron Dori has over 25 years of experience advising technology, telecommunications, media, life sciences, and other types of companies on their most pressing business challenges. He is a former chair of the firm’s technology, communications and media practices and currently serves on the…

Yaron Dori has over 25 years of experience advising technology, telecommunications, media, life sciences, and other types of companies on their most pressing business challenges. He is a former chair of the firm’s technology, communications and media practices and currently serves on the firm’s eight-person Management Committee.

Yaron’s practice advises clients on strategic planning, policy development, transactions, investigations and enforcement, and regulatory compliance.

Early in his career, Yaron advised telecommunications companies and investors on regulatory policy and frameworks that led to the development of broadband networks. When those networks became bidirectional and enabled companies to collect consumer data, he advised those companies on their data privacy and consumer protection obligations. Today, as new technologies such as Artificial Intelligence (AI) are being used to enhance the applications and services offered by such companies, he advises them on associated legal and regulatory obligations and risks. It is this varied background – which tracks the evolution of the technology industry – that enables Yaron to provide clients with a holistic, 360-degree view of technology policy, regulation, compliance, and enforcement.

Yaron represents clients before federal regulatory agencies—including the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), and the Department of Commerce (DOC)—and the U.S. Congress in connection with a range of issues under the Communications Act, the Federal Trade Commission Act, and similar statutes. He also represents clients on state regulatory and enforcement matters, including those that pertain to telecommunications, data privacy, and consumer protection regulation. His deep experience in each of these areas enables him to advise clients on a wide range of technology regulations and key business issues in which these areas intersect.

With respect to technology and telecommunications matters, Yaron advises clients on a broad range of business, policy and consumer-facing issues, including:

Artificial Intelligence and the Internet of Things;
Broadband deployment and regulation;

IP-enabled applications, services and content;
Section 230 and digital safety considerations;
Equipment and device authorization procedures;
The Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA);

Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI) requirements;

The Cable Privacy Act
Net Neutrality; and
Local competition, universal service, and intercarrier compensation.

Yaron also has extensive experience in structuring transactions and securing regulatory approvals at both the federal and state levels for mergers, asset acquisitions and similar transactions involving large and small FCC and state communication licensees.

With respect to privacy and consumer protection matters, Yaron advises clients on a range of business, strategic, policy and compliance issues, including those that pertain to:

The FTC Act and related agency guidance and regulations;
State privacy laws, such as the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) and California Privacy Rights Act, the Colorado Privacy Act, the Connecticut Data Privacy Act, the Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act, and the Utah Consumer Privacy Act;
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA);
Location-based services that use WiFi, beacons or similar technologies;
Digital advertising practices, including native advertising and endorsements and testimonials; and

The application of federal and state telemarketing, commercial fax, and other consumer protection laws, such as the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), to voice, text, and video transmissions.

Yaron also has experience advising companies on congressional, FCC, FTC and state attorney general investigations into various consumer protection and communications matters, including those pertaining to social media influencers, digital disclosures, product discontinuance, and advertising claims.

Photo of Brian Williams Brian Williams

Brian Williams provides counsel to clients on all facets of a wide range of U.S. regulatory processes at the intersection of law, cross-border investment, technology, and national security. This includes the transactional review process administered by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the…

Brian Williams provides counsel to clients on all facets of a wide range of U.S. regulatory processes at the intersection of law, cross-border investment, technology, and national security. This includes the transactional review process administered by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) and related national security and law enforcement reviews conducted by the Committee for the Assessment of Foreign Participation in the U.S. Telecommunications Services Sector (known informally as “Team Telecom”) that involve foreign applicants for certain categories of Federal Communications Commission (FCC) telecommunications licenses.

He has assisted dozens of clients on both the buy and sell sides across a tremendous range of industry sectors (including AI, semiconductors, robotics, advanced transportation technologies, life sciences, and healthcare, as well as telecommunications, energy, and financial services infrastructure, products, and services) successfully evaluate and navigate these review processes to realize their transactional goals. Brian also has extensive experience successfully advising sovereign, private equity, and other fund clients on the unique challenges and opportunities they may face when coming before these regulatory regimes.

Brian also advises clients on related emerging areas of U.S. national security regulation, including the Department of Justice’s Data Security Program; the Department of Commerce’s Information and Communications Technology and Services (ICTS) and related rules (including the Connected Vehicle rule); and the Department of the Treasury’s Outbound Investment Rule.

Brian draws on expertise developed over 30 years of public and private sector service, including as an intelligence officer in the U.S. Air Force. After the conclusion of his military service, Brian spent over a decade advising a variety of U.S. government clients on issues related to national security, technology, commerce, and law. He is the principal architect of the risk framework that became the de facto standard for all transactional risk assessments conducted by CFIUS and Team Telecom and has counseled the most senior officials at the Department of Defense and the Department of Homeland Security on how to identify, assess, and address potential national security risks potentially posed by foreign investments, acquisitions, and collaborations. He led multi-agency analytic teams that authored the majority of CFIUS and Team Telecom risk assessments during his tenure, while providing the U.S. Government diligence, risk analysis, and mitigation strategy development and negotiation support on nearly 1,700 CFIUS transactions and over 1,000 FCC license applications before Team Telecom.

Photo of Corey Walker Corey Walker

Corey Walker advises clients on a broad range of regulatory, compliance, and enforcement matters in the media, technology, satellite and space, and telecommunications sectors. Corey also provides strategic counsel to leading media, sports, and technology companies on gaming matters, with a focus on…

Corey Walker advises clients on a broad range of regulatory, compliance, and enforcement matters in the media, technology, satellite and space, and telecommunications sectors. Corey also provides strategic counsel to leading media, sports, and technology companies on gaming matters, with a focus on sports betting, fantasy sports, and online gaming.

Corey represents clients before the Federal Communications Commission in connection with a range of policy and compliance issues, including satellite and earth station operations, radiofrequency (RF) spectrum use and availability, and experimental licensing for new and innovative technologies. He also advises clients on structuring transactions and securing regulatory approvals at the federal, state, and local levels for mergers, asset acquisitions, and similar transactions involving FCC and state telecommunications licensees and companies holding private remote sensing space system licenses issued by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

Corey also maintains an active gaming and sports betting practice, and routinely counsels companies on state licensing and compliance matters, including those that pertain to fantasy sports and online gaming.

Photo of John Bowers John Bowers

John Bowers is an associate in the firm’s Washington, DC office. He is a member of the Data Privacy and Cybersecurity Practice Group and the Technology and Communications Regulation Practice Group.

John advises clients on a wide range of privacy and communications issues…

John Bowers is an associate in the firm’s Washington, DC office. He is a member of the Data Privacy and Cybersecurity Practice Group and the Technology and Communications Regulation Practice Group.

John advises clients on a wide range of privacy and communications issues, including compliance with telecommunications regulations and U.S. state and federal privacy laws.