In a recent decision, the Northern District of Illinois dismissed a deceptive advertising class action filed against Mondeléz International, Inc. (“Mondeléz”). Salguero v. Mondeléz Int’l, Inc., 2025 WL 3004534, at *6 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 27, 2025). Mondeléz, a snack food company, manufactured and distributed energy snack bars (“Zbars”) while labeling the packaging as “climate neutral
Latest from Inside Class Actions - Page 4
California Court Rejects First Algorithmic Price Fixing Case to Reach Summary Judgment
On October 20, a California trial court granted summary judgment in favor of defendants in Mach v. Yardi Systems, Inc., rejecting class plaintiffs’ claims that defendants violated California’s antitrust law, the Cartwright Act, through their common use of rental pricing software. The decision, which relied on “critical” evidence produced by defendant Yardi Systems in discovery,
Ninth Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Wiretap Claims Based on Party Exception
On October 27, 2025, the Ninth Circuit affirmed in a memorandum opinion the dismissal of a proposed class action asserting that the owner of a cybersecurity browser extension violated the California Invasion of Privacy Act (“CIPA”) and the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (“ECPA”) by intercepting communications between extension-users and search engines. Karwowski v. Gen Digital,
Court Applies Popa to Dismiss CIPA Pen Register Claim for Lack of Article III Standing
In a win for businesses using third-party technologies to power their websites, a California federal court applied the Ninth Circuit’s recent decision in Popa v. Microsoft Corporation to dismiss a “pen register” claim brought under the California Invasion of Privacy Act (“CIPA”) for lack of Article III standing. Khamooshi v. Politico LLC, No. 24-cv-07836-SK, 2025
Valuation and Standing—The Sixth Circuit Creates a Class Action Split
In its recent decision in Clippinger v. State Farm, the Sixth Circuit addressed the certification of a class in a breach-of-contract dispute over insurance valuation claims, in which the defendant contended that individualized evidence would be needed to determine whether the alleged breach caused actual monetary injury to class members. Similar class certification issues have
Ninth Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Supplement Marketing Claims as Impliedly Preempted
In a win for implied preemption, the Ninth Circuit recently affirmed dismissal of supplement marketing claims under California’s Unfair Competition Law (UCL). The case, Bubak v. Golo, LLC, No. 24-492 (9th Cir. Oct. 9, 2025), held that the plaintiff’s UCL claim was impliedly preempted because it depended entirely on alleged violations of the federal
Standing in the Dark: Fourth Circuit Finds Standing for Driver’s License Information on the Dark Web
Courts continue to grapple with the type of “concrete harm” that is required to confer Article III standing under TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez, 594 U.S. 413 (2021), particularly in data breach and privacy class actions. On October 14, the Fourth Circuit contributed to this debate, holding that allegations that plaintiffs’ driver’s license data had been
SEC Changes Policy on Issuer-Investor Arbitration Provisions With Important Implications for Securities Class Actions
The SEC has long had a policy that effectively prohibited public companies from requiring arbitration of shareholder claims under the Securities Act[1] and Securities Exchange Act.[2] Last month, the SEC announced a change to that policy. In its September 17, 2025 Policy Statement, the SEC stated that, effective September 19, 2025, “the
Illinois Court Narrows Lawsuit Over Medical Center’s Use of Pixel Technology and Strikes Class Claims
In a recent decision by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Judge Georgia N. Alexakis narrowed and struck class claims alleging that the University of Chicago Medical Center’s use of pixel technology violated the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA).
The plaintiff, Sophia Hartley, asserted on behalf of a putative class
Post-Cantero, Ninth Circuit Allows Prior National Bank Act Preemption Decision To Remain Standing
In 2018, the Ninth Circuit held in Lusnak v. Bank of America, N.A. that California’s interest-on-escrow law was not preempted by the National Bank Act because the California law did not prevent or significantly interfere with the bank’s exercise of its powers. 883 F.3d 1185 (9th Cir. 2018). Six years after Lusnak, the Supreme Court