Last week, Secretary Hegseth delivered a speech at the National War College introducing transformations to the defense procurement process. Among them, the Secretary discussed awarding companies bigger and longer contracts for proven systems; removing “excessive and burdensome” requirements (for example, acquisition rules, accounting standards, and testing oversight); and empowering program leaders with authority to direct
Blog Authors
Latest from Inside Government Contracts
Massachusetts Seeks to Expand Defense Footprint with Nearly $47 Million in New Projects
Massachusetts aims to be the “cornerstone of the defense industry,” with Governor Maura Healey announcing nearly $47 million in government funding for defense-related projects. Last year, the Department of Defense ranked Massachusetts ninth out of the top ten states in total Defense spending in FY2023, and the state is aiming to expand its investment in…
August, September, and October 2025 Cybersecurity Developments Under the Trump Administration
This is the seventh blog in a series of Covington blogs on cybersecurity policies, executive orders (“EOs”), and other actions of the Trump Administration. The sixth blog is available here and our initial blog is available here. This blog describes key cybersecurity developments that took place in August, September, and October 2025.
NIST Publishes…
How Will DoW Determine Which Level of CMMC Applies to My Agreement?
Now that the final Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) Program and Procurement Rules have been issued by the Department of War (DoW) (see our CMMC Toolkit for in-depth analysis of these Rules) and the CMMC Program is set to begin in earnest, there is some uncertainty in industry as to how DoW will determine which…
U.S. Department of Commerce Opens New Funding Opportunity for Semiconductor R&D
The Department of Commerce recently released a new funding opportunity to support semiconductor-related research and development using funds appropriated under the CHIPS Act of 2022 (Pub. L. No. 117-167, 136 Stat. 1366 (Aug. 9, 2022)). Set forth below are a few key considerations that interested applicants should bear in mind when evaluating this opportunity, including…
Overhauling the GSA Schedule
On October 17, 2025, the General Services Administration (“GSA”) announced that it plans to issue a Mass Modification to GSA’s Multiple Award Schedule (“MAS” or “Schedule”) Solicitation[1] and Schedule contracts in November 2025 (“Refresh”). Periodically, GSA may issue a Mass Modification to Schedule contracts to uniformly impose changes to the contract terms applicable to…
JCIDS, Rewired: What DoD’s New Requirements Memo Means
On August 20, 2025, the Department of Defense (“DoD”) issued a sweeping memo that tears up and rebuilds the way the military decides what new weapons and systems it needs. The Military Services appear to be wasting no time translating the memo into action. Acquisition leaders at last week’s Association of the United States Army…
Expired: SBIR/STTR and DPA Authorities in Limbo
Two cornerstone authorities for federal contracting quietly expired on September 30, 2025, creating ripple effects that contractors—small and large—cannot afford to overlook. The Small Business Innovation Research/Small Business Technology Transfer (“SBIR/STTR”) programs, commonly known as “America’s Seed Fund” for their role in fueling early-stage innovation, and the Defense Production Act (“DPA”), the backbone of the…
Revolutionary FAR Overhaul Seeks to Make Post-Award, Agency-Level Protests More Enticing
As part of the Trump Administration’s Revolutionary FAR Overhaul[1] (“RFO”), the FAR Council has released a model deviation for FAR Part 33 – Protests, Disputes, and Appeals, which includes changes that seem intended to make agency-level protests more appealing to disappointed offerors. It remains to be seen whether these proposed changes will have the…
E-Verify and the False Claims Act: An Emerging Tool in Immigration Enforcement
On September 18, 2025, the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) announced a civil False Claims Act (“FCA”) settlement against a New Jersey shipbuilder to resolve allegations that it improperly employed unauthorized workers to work on Navy ships. The settlement, which exceeded $4 million, is the second this year involving government contractors alleged to have employed…